Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 537
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.675 (2026)

Tort victims' compensation fund established

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  537.675.  Tort victims' compensation fund established — definitions — notification of punitive damage award to attorney general, lien for deposit into fund — legal services for low-income people. — 1.  As used in sections 537.675 through 537.693, the following terms mean:

  (1)  "Annual claims", that period of time commencing on the first day of January of every year after December 31, 2002, and ending on the last day of that calendar year;

  (2)  "Commission", the labor and industrial relations commission;

  (3)  "Division", the division of workers' compensation;

  (4)  "Punitive damage final judgment", an award for punitive damages excluding interest that is no longer subject to review by courts of this state or of the United States;

  (5)  "Uncompensated tort victim", a person who:

  (a)  Is a party in a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit; or is a tort victim whose claim against the tort-feasor has been settled for the policy limits of insurance covering the liability of such tort-feasor and such policy limits are inadequate in light of the nature and extent of damages due to the personal injury or wrongful death;

  (b)  Unless described in paragraph (a) of this subdivision:

  a.  Has obtained a final monetary judgment in that lawsuit described in paragraph (a) of this subdivision against a tort-feasor for personal injuries, or wrongful death in a case in which all appeals are final;

  b.  Has exercised due diligence in enforcing the judgment; and

  c.  Has not collected the full amount of the judgment;

  (c)  Is not a corporation, company, partnership or other incorporated or unincorporated commercial entity;

  (d)  Is not any entity claiming a right of subrogation;

  (e)  Was not on house arrest and was not confined in any federal, state, regional, county or municipal jail, prison or other correctional facility at the time he or she sustained injury from the tort-feasor;

  (f)  Has not pleaded guilty to or been found guilty of two or more felonies, where such two or more felonies occurred within ten years of the occurrence of the tort in question, and where either of such felonies involved a controlled substance or an act of violence; and

  (g)  Is a resident of the state of Missouri or sustained personal injury or death by a tort which occurred in the state of Missouri.

  2.  There is created the "Tort Victims' Compensation Fund". Unexpended moneys in the fund shall not lapse at the end of the biennium as provided in section 33.080.

  3.  Any party receiving a judgment final for purposes of appeal for punitive damages in any case filed in any division of any circuit court of the state of Missouri shall notify the attorney general of the state of Missouri of such award, except for actions claiming improper health care pursuant to chapter 538.  The state of Missouri shall have a lien for deposit into the tort victims' compensation fund to the extent of fifty percent of the punitive damage final judgment which shall attach in any such case after deducting attorney's fees and expenses.  In each case, the attorney general shall serve a lien notice by certified mail or registered mail upon the party or parties against whom the state has a claim for collection of its share of a punitive damage final judgment.  On a petition filed by the state, the court, on written notice to all interested parties, shall adjudicate the rights of the parties and enforce the lien.  The lien shall not be satisfied out of any recovery until the attorney's claim for fees and expenses is paid.  The state can file its lien in all cases where punitive damages are awarded upon the entry of the judgment final for purposes of appeal.  The state cannot enforce its lien until there is a punitive damage final judgment.  Cases resolved by arbitration, mediation or compromise settlement prior to a punitive damage final judgment are exempt from the provisions of this section.  Nothing in this section shall hinder or in any way affect the right or ability of the parties to any claim or lawsuit to compromise or settle such claim or litigation on any terms and at any time the parties desire.

  4.  The state of Missouri shall have no interest in or right to intervene at any stage of any judicial proceeding pursuant to this section, except to enforce its lien rights as provided in subsection 3 of this section.

  5.  Twenty-six percent of all payments deposited into the tort victims' compensation fund and all interest accruing on the principal regardless of source or designation shall be transferred to the basic civil legal services fund established in section 477.650.  Moneys in the tort victims' compensation fund shall not be used to pay any portion of a refund mandated by Article X, Section 18 of the Constitution.

­­--------

(L. 1987 H.B. 700 § 40, A.L. 1996 S.B. 869, A.L. 2001 H.B. 107, A.L. 2008 S.B. 1016, A.L. 2010 H.B. 1965)

(2002) Provision permitting state to assert lien on 50% of final judgment for punitive damages does not violate the excessive fine provision of the Eighth Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. Hoskins v. Business Men's Assurance, 79 S.W.3d 901 (Mo.banc).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp., 996 S.W.2d 47 (Mo. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp., 996 S.W.2d 47 (Mo. 1999). · cites it 15× “With these considerations in mind, this Court concludes that the challenge to section 537.675 is real and substantial and was brought in good faith, and as such, it provides a proper basis for this Court’s jurisdiction without need to address the other constitutional challenges.”
Lopez v. Three Rivers Elec. Coop., Inc., 26 S.W.3d 151 (Mo. 2000). · cites it 6× “The Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, transferred the appeal to this Court because the appeal involves, among other issues, the validity of a state statute, section 537.675(2), RSMo 1994. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.”
Alcorn v. Union Pac. R.R., 50 S.W.3d 226 (Mo. 2001). · cites it 4× “The issues include whether Missouri’s punitive damages extraction statute, section 537.675, 2 violates the United States and Missouri Constitutions.”
Delacroix v. Doncasters, Inc., 407 S.W.3d 13 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 5× “” Plaintiffs’ counsel argued that this reference opened the door to allowing Plaintiffs an opportunity to inform the jury that Plaintiffs would not receive a $50 million payday because half of the amount awarded would go to the Tort Victims’ Compensation Fund pursuant to section…”
BMW of North Am., Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559 (1996). · cites it 2× “2, 1995) (would allocate 48% of punitive damages to state university system and 12% to school for the deaf and blind).”
Hoskins v. Bus. Men's Assurance, 79 S.W.3d 901 (Mo. 2002). · cites it 14× “On appeal, no party sought to defend the validity of section 537.675. 1 The attorney general, representing the state, was permitted to intervene for that purpose.”
Lopez v. Three Rivers Elec. Coop., Inc., 53 S.W.3d 117 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 17× “In one of its Points Relied On, Defendant challenges the constitutionality of Section 537.675 RSMo. (1994), which allows the attorney general, on behalf of the State, to collect fifty percent of any punitive damages award.”
Smith v. Printup, 866 P.2d 985 (Kan. 1993). · cites it 2× “Missouri ( Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.675 [2] [1992 Supp.]) 6.”
Henderson v. Fields, 68 S.W.3d 455 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “3 In his third point, Appellant claims the trial court erred in allowing Respondent to comment on the Tort Victims’ Compensation Fund, § 537.675 RSMo, during closing argument in the punitive damages phase of the trial and in failing to grant a mistrial thereafter.”
Hoskins v. Bus. Men's Assurance, 116 S.W.3d 557 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “Manufacturer and its successor appealed to the Missouri Supreme Court, which declared section 537.675 1 constitutional in Hoskins v.”
Fust v. Attorney Gen., 947 S.W.2d 424 (Mo. 1997). · cites it 2× “Section 537.675 is not special legislation prohibited by article III, sec.”
Farmers Ins. Exch. v. Shirley, 958 P.2d 1040 (Wyo. 1998). · cites it 2× “• Missouri Mo.Rev.Stat. § 537.675 (1994) (allocates 50% of punitive damages, after payment of expenses and counsel fees, to Tort Victims' Compensation Fund).”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.675(2) — 4 cases
Lopez v. Three Rivers Elec. Coop., Inc., 26 S.W.3d 151 (Mo. 2000). “The Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, transferred the appeal to this Court because the appeal involves, among other issues, the validity of a state statute, section 537.675(2), RSMo 1994. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.”
Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp., 996 S.W.2d 47 (Mo. 1999). “With these considerations in mind, this Court concludes that the challenge to section 537.675 is real and substantial and was brought in good faith, and as such, it provides a proper basis for this Court’s jurisdiction without need to address the other constitutional challenges.”
Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Johnson, 684 So. 2d 685 (Ala. 1996).
Gen. Resources Org., Inc. v. Deadman, 932 S.W.2d 485 (Tex. 1996).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.