544.390. Examination and recognizance, certified, when. — All examinations and recognizances taken in pursuance of the provisions of this chapter shall be certified by the associate circuit judge taking the same, and delivered to the clerk of the court in which the offense is cognizable, on or before the first day of the next term thereof, except that where the prisoner is committed to jail, the examination of himself and of the witnesses for or against him, duly certified, shall accompany the warrant of commitment, and be delivered therewith to the jailer.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1966–1980 · leading case:
State v. Greer, 605 S.W.2d 93 (Mo. 1980).
State v. Greer, 605 S.W.2d 93 (Mo. 1980).
· cites it 2× “Appellant further asserts that he was thereby denied due process and equal protection of law. He points out if he had been charged by information with having committed a homicide a preliminary hearing would have been required at which the evidence given by the several witnesses…”
State v. Eaton, 504 S.W.2d 12 (Mo. 1973).
· cites it 2× “) Section 544.390 provides that such examinations shall be certified by the magistrate, and that where the prisoner is committed to jail, the examination shall accompany the warrant of commitment, and be delivered therewith to the jailer.”
State v. Fleming, 451 S.W.2d 119 (Mo. 1970).
· cites it 7× “§ 544.390, RSMo 1949, Y.A.M.S.: “All examinations and recognizances taken in pursuance of the provisions of this chapter shall be certified by the magistrate taking the same, and delivered to the clerk of the court in which the offense is cognizable, on or before the first day…”
Cruces v. State, 452 S.W.2d 180 (Mo. 1970).
· cites it 2× “, and Sections 544.390 and 544.370, RSMo 1959, V.”
State v. Hughey, 404 S.W.2d 725 (Mo. 1966).
“On the day of trial, June 21, defendant filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the transcript of the testimony had not been filed on or before June 7, in conformity with § 544.390, and was not certified by the Magistrate as required by that section.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.