Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 570.140 (2026)

Deceptive business practice

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  570.140.  Deceptive business practice — penalty. — 1.  A person commits the offense of deceptive business practice if in the course of engaging in a business, occupation or profession, he or she recklessly:

  (1)  Uses or possesses for use a false weight or measure, or any other device for falsely determining or recording any quality or quantity;

  (2)  Sells, offers, displays for sale, or delivers less than the represented quantity of any commodity or service;

  (3)  Takes or attempts to take more than the represented quantity of any commodity or service when as buyer he or she furnishes the weight or measure;

  (4)  Sells, offers, or exposes for sale adulterated or mislabeled commodities;

  (5)  Makes a false or misleading written statement for the purpose of obtaining property or credit;

  (6)  Promotes the sale of property or services by a false or misleading statement in any advertisement; or

  (7)  Advertises in any manner the sale of property or services with the purpose not to sell or provide the property or services:

  (a)  At the price which he or she offered them;

  (b)  In a quantity sufficient to meet the reasonably expected public demand, unless the quantity is specifically stated in the advertisement; or

  (c)  At all.

  2.  The offense of deceptive business practice is a class A misdemeanor.

­­--------

(L. 1977 S.B. 60, A.L. 2014 S.B. 491)

Effective 1-01-17

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1986–2019 · leading case: Jones v. Galaxy 1 Mktg., Inc., 478 S.W.3d 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).
Jones v. Galaxy 1 Mktg., Inc., 478 S.W.3d 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 16× “Deceptive Business Practices Section 570.140 Jones next asserts that the Deceptive Business Practice Act also affords him the protection of the public-policy exception in his claim of wrongful termination.”
Jennifer Kerr v. Vatterott Educ. Centers, Inc., 439 S.W.3d 802 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “We also find unpersuasive Vatterott’s comparison of its behavior to that found in section 570.140, a criminal statute that punishes deceptive business practices.”
Beasley v. Affiliated Hosp. Prods., 713 S.W.2d 557 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “He claims compliance with his supervisor’s instructions would have resulted in violating § 570.140 RSMo [Deceptive Business Practice]; § 570.”
State v. Reyes, 862 S.W.2d 377 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993). “085 — Unlawful Endangerment of Property; § 570.140 — Deceptive Business Practice; § 570.”
Carlos Jones v. Galaxy 1 Mktg., Inc., No. ED102633 (Mo. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2015). · cites it 14× “Deceptive Business Practice, Section 570.140 Jones next asserts that the Deceptive Business Practice Act also affords him the protection of the public-policy exception in his claim of wrongful termination.”
State of Missouri v. Jeffrey Scott Kowalski, 587 S.W.3d 709 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “0201) (“Count 1” or “criminal merchandising practices”), one count of the class-A misdemeanor of deceptive business practices (see section 570.140), one count of the class-B misdemeanor of identity theft (see section 570.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.