Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 573
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 573.507 (2026)

Minimum age limit

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  573.507.  Minimum age limit — security personnel — random drug testing — space limitation — prohibition of public displays. — 1.  Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may establish a minimum age limit for admission into any adult cabaret within the city or county.

  2.  Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may require security personnel to be present on the premises of any adult cabaret within the city or county.

  3.  Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may require employers of any adult cabaret within the city or county to conduct random testing for the presence of illegal substances within the blood or urine of any or all employees of such adult cabaret.

  4.  Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may prohibit within such city or county any live public nudity within ten feet of any person observing such nudity.

  5.  Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any city not within a county and any county may prohibit within such city or county the public display of sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse or appearing in a state of nudity in any adult cabaret.

­­--------

(L. 1993 S.B. 180 § 14)

Effective 7-02-93

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: Reno v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Reno v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997). · cites it 2× “§ 97 -5—11 (1994) (no minors in poolrooms, billiard halls, or where alcohol is sold); Mo. Rev. Stat. § 573.507 (1995) (no minors in adult cabarets); Neb.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.