Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 65
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 65.210 (2026)

Warrant of appointment

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  65.210.  Warrant of appointment — notification to appointee. — Whenever any appointment shall be made, as provided in section 65.200, the township board shall cause a warrant of appointment to be filed in the office of the township clerk, who shall immediately give notice to the person or persons appointed; provided, that when the county commission shall make such appointment they shall cause notice thereof, in writing, to be transmitted by the county clerk to the township clerk, who shall file the same and give notice to the appointee, as provided in section 65.140.

­­--------

(RSMo 1939 § 13963)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 12286; 1919 § 13199; 1909 § 11687

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1964–1982 · leading case: Waeckerle v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 525 S.W.2d 351 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Waeckerle v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 525 S.W.2d 351 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 6× “” Section 65.210, supra, provides identically in dealing generally with conditional uses in the various zoning districts of the city.”
Dunbar v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 380 S.W.2d 442 (Mo. 1964). · cites it 2× “The zoning application was filed pursuant to Section 65.210, Revised Ordinances of Kansas City, Missouri, as amended, and sought a permit to construct in stages two lagoons or cells, each comprising two acres, on either eight acres or eleven acres of land, located about 2,500…”
Vill. of Claycomo v. City of Kansas City, 635 S.W.2d 365 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982). “There is no basis for relief stated by remaining plaintiffs, Edwards and the Village of Claycomo, in paragraph 6 of the amended petition that Kansas City has violated its own ordinance, § 65.210, in failing to secure a permit for the proposed landfill from its Board of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.