Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 99
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 99.800 (2026)

Law, how cited

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  99.800.  Law, how cited. — Sections 99.800 to 99.865 shall be known and may be cited as the "Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act".

­­--------

(L. 1982 H.B. 1411 & 1587 § 1)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases, 1989–2015 · leading case: Saint Louis Univ. v. Masonic Temple Ass'n of St. Louis, 220 S.W.3d 721 (Mo. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Saint Louis Univ. v. Masonic Temple Ass'n of St. Louis, 220 S.W.3d 721 (Mo. 2007). · cites it 4× “" [2] TIF is outlined in sections 99.800 to 99.865, RSMo 2000 (and, where amended, RSMo Supp.”
State Ex Rel. Hazelwood Yellow Ribbon Comm. v. Klos, 35 S.W.3d 457 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “TIF Development in Hazelwood In January of 1998 the City of Hazel-wood, acting pursuant to the MISSOURI Real PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION REDEVELOPMENT act (section 99.800 et seq., RSMo 1994 1 ) (the “TIF Act”), established by ordinance a commission (the Hazelwood Tax…”
Smith v. City of St. Louis, 395 S.W.3d 20 (Mo. 2013). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs assert in the third point in the cross-appeal that the trial court “erred in not finding the TIF commission was under any other obligation to deny the redevelopment project for lacking conformity to section 99.800 et seq.” This point does not identify a challenged…”
Northgate Apts. v. City of North Kansas City, 45 S.W.3d 475 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “On February 1, 2000, pursuant to the Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, Section 99.800 et seq. RSMo Cum.Supp. 1998 (hereinafter “the TIF law”), the *478 North Kansas City City Council passed and the Mayor approved Ordinance No.”
Par. v. Novus Equities Co., 231 S.W.3d 236 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Facts and Procedural History In the spring of 2004, the City, a fourth class city, expressed interest in having a private organization redevelop an area within the City’s boundaries known as the Sunset Manor neighborhood (Redevelopment Area) through the use of tax increment…”
State Ex Rel. City of Desloge v. St. Francois Cnty., 245 S.W.3d 855 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Introduction This is a mandamus case which involves the procedure for management of a tax increment financing (TIF) project under the Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, Sections 99.800 to 99.865 RSMo. (2000) 1 (“the TIF Act”).”
Tax Increment Fin. Comm'n of Kansas City v. J.E. Dunn Constr. Co., 781 S.W.2d 70 (Mo. 1989). · cites it 2× “Dunn Construction Company (“Dunn”) challenges the constitutionality of the Missouri Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, Sections 99.800 to 99.865, RSMo 1986 (“the Act”).”
Zahner v. City of Perryville, 813 S.W.2d 855 (Mo. 1991). · cites it 2× “There this Court avoided application of Hancock to the Missouri Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, Sections 99.800 to 99.865, RSMo 1986, by holding that: First, it makes no difference to the resolution of this point whether PILOTS are taxes as Dunn…”
Allright Props., Inc. v. Tax Increment Fin. Comm'n of Kansas City, 240 S.W.3d 777 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “The Missouri Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, Section 99.800 to 99.865, RSMo Supp.2006, permits a municipality to develop what is commonly referred to as a tax increment financing project, or TIF project, for the purpose of redeveloping an area.”
State Ex Rel. Broadway-Washington Assocs., Ltd. v. Manners, 186 S.W.3d 272 (Mo. 2006). “FACTS The Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act sections 99.800 to 99.865 authorizes municipalities to utilize eminent domain to take private property to facilitate redevelopment.”
City of Shelbina v. Shelby Cnty., 245 S.W.3d 249 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “1 states in pertinent part: *253 A municipality, either at the time a redevelopment project is approved or, in the event a municipality has undertaken acts establishing a redevelopment plan and redevelopment project and has designated a redevelopment area after the passage and…”
Sch. Dist. of Riverview Gardens v. St. Louis Cnty., 816 S.W.2d 219 (Mo. 1991). · cites it 2× “alue of "new construction and improvements" shall include the additional assessed value of all improvements or additions to real property which were begun after and were not part of the prior year's assessment, except that the additional assessed value of all improvements or…”
Show all 26 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.