Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 13-1-111 (2026)

Qualifications Of Voter

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 13. ELECTIONS

CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Part 1. General Provisions

Qualifications Of Voter

13-1-111. Qualifications of voter. (1) A person may not vote at elections unless the person is:

(a) registered as required by law;

(b) 18 years of age or older;

(c) a resident of the state of Montana and of the county in which the person offers to vote for at least 30 days, except as provided in 13-2-514; and

(d) a citizen of the United States.

(2) A person convicted of a felony does not have the right to vote while the person is serving a sentence in a penal institution.

(3) A person adjudicated to be of unsound mind does not have the right to vote unless the person has been restored to capacity as provided by law.

History: En. Sec. 6, Ch. 368, L. 1969; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 120, L. 1971; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 158, L. 1971; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 40, L. 1973; R.C.M. 1947, 23-2701; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 273, L. 2007.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1986–2020 · leading case: Olson v. Dep't of Revenue, 726 P.2d 1162 (Mont. 1986).
Olson v. Dep't of Revenue, 726 P.2d 1162 (Mont. 1986). · cites it 9× “Appellants subsequently moved the court to enter a partial summary judgment that Section 13-1-111(1) (c) is unconstitutional *468 as applied to them.”
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005). “IV, §2; Mont. Code Ann. §13-1-111 (2003) Nebraska 18 Neb.”
Reichert v. State Ex Rel. Mcculloch, 2012 MT 111 (Mont. 2012). · cites it 2× “" Section 13-1-111(1)(a), (c), MCA. Thus, in requiring the person to be a "qualified elector of the supreme court district," LR-119 would effectively create two new qualifications for Supreme Court justice: at the time of election or appointment, the justice (a) must be…”
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988). “IV, §2; Mont. Code Ann. §13-1-111 (1987) Neb. Neb.”
Montana Democratic Party v. Eaton, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (D. Mont. 2008). · cites it 2× “Part of that process is set forth in MontCode Ann. § 13-1-111, which provides that “a person may not vote at elections unless the person is .”
Voting Rights Coalition v. Wilson, 60 F.3d 1411 (9th Cir. 1995). “IV, § 2; Mont.Code Ann. § 13-1-111 (1994); Or. Const, art.”
Porter v. Jones, 518 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “BOWEN slavery voters from Missouri crossing the border to counter pro-abolition voters from New England.”
Greenwood v. Dep't of Revenue, 2020 MT 149 (Mont. 2020). · cites it 2× “Greenwood represented himself to be a Montana resident during the 2008 to 2012 audit years when he voted in Montana elections, see § 13-1-111(1), MCA (“A person may not vote at elections unless the person is .”
Bischoff v. High Sch. Dist. No. 4, 749 P.2d 533 (Mont. 1988). · cites it 3× “Under Section 20-20-303, MCA, an elector’s qualifications may be challenged under either Section 13-2-404, MCA, or Section 13-13-301, MCA. Section 13-2-404 governs challenges prior to the election and Section 13-13-301 provides for challenges made on election day and is the…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 13-1-111(1) — 2 cases
Olson v. Dep't of Revenue, 726 P.2d 1162 (Mont. 1986). “Appellants subsequently moved the court to enter a partial summary judgment that Section 13-1-111(1) (c) is unconstitutional *468 as applied to them.”
Greenwood v. Dep't of Revenue, 2020 MT 149 (Mont. 2020). “Greenwood represented himself to be a Montana resident during the 2008 to 2012 audit years when he voted in Montana elections, see § 13-1-111(1), MCA (“A person may not vote at elections unless the person is .”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 13-1-111(1)(a) — 1 case
Reichert v. State Ex Rel. Mcculloch, 2012 MT 111 (Mont. 2012). “" Section 13-1-111(1)(a), (c), MCA. Thus, in requiring the person to be a "qualified elector of the supreme court district," LR-119 would effectively create two new qualifications for Supreme Court justice: at the time of election or appointment, the justice (a) must be…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 13-1-111(1)(c) — 1 case
Olson v. Dep't of Revenue, 726 P.2d 1162 (Mont. 1986). “Appellants subsequently moved the court to enter a partial summary judgment that Section 13-1-111(1) (c) is unconstitutional *468 as applied to them.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.