Notes of Decisions
Cited in
9
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2021 · leading case:
Larson v. State, 2019 MT 28, 434 P.3d 241.
Larson v. State, 2019 MT 28, 434 P.3d 241.
· cites it 240× “BACKGROUND ¶3 To be eligible to nominate candidates for election to public offices on the ballot in Montana, political parties must qualify as specified by § 13-10-601, MCA. In the case of a political party that did not have a candidate in either of the last two general…”
Democratic Party v. Stapleton, 2020 MT 244.
· cites it 32× “4 ¶5 The Montana Democratic Party and four petitioner signers who asked to have their signatures removed from the petition sued the Secretary, seeking an injunction to prevent the Secretary and his office from giving effect to the petition.”
Democratic Party v. Stapleton, 2020 MT 244.
· cites it 3× “The District Court found—and none of the parties or amici disputed—the Montana Green Party was not involved and did not endorse the petition process at issue in this case at the time the signatures were gathered and presented to election administrators.”
Montana Green Party v. Jacobsen, No. 6:18-cv-00087 (D. Mont. Mar. 20, 2020).
· cites it 14× “Second, a minor political party will appear on the primary election ballot if it submits a petition signed by registered voters that complies with the petition program described in Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-601 (2). Montana’s petition program includes a statewide signature…”
Davis v. Stapleton, 480 F. Supp. 3d 1099 (D. Mont. 2020).
· cites it 8× “” Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-601 (2)(a). To succeed, The petition must be signed by a number of registered voters equal to 5% or more of the total votes cast for the successful candidate for governor at the last general election or 5,000 electors, whichever is less.”
Democratic Party v. Stapleton, No. DA 20-0396 (Mont. Aug. 19, 2020).
· cites it 2× “of § 13-10-601(2), MCA, and thus enjoined the Secretary and all persons acting under his authority from giving any effect to the Green Party petition for ballot access.”
Byorth v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., No. 1:17-cv-00153, 2019 WL 6715970 (D. Mont. Dec. 10, 2019).
“2019) (discussing whether the legislature intended to create a private right of action for enforcing § 13-10-601(2) by declaratory judgment in connection with the UDJA).”
Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-601(1): 1 case
Larson v. State, 2019 MT 28, 434 P.3d 241.
“BACKGROUND ¶3 To be eligible to nominate candidates for election to public offices on the ballot in Montana, political parties must qualify as specified by § 13-10-601, MCA. In the case of a political party that did not have a candidate in either of the last two general…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-601(2): 5 cases
Larson v. State, 2019 MT 28, 434 P.3d 241.
“BACKGROUND ¶3 To be eligible to nominate candidates for election to public offices on the ballot in Montana, political parties must qualify as specified by § 13-10-601, MCA. In the case of a political party that did not have a candidate in either of the last two general…”
Democratic Party v. Stapleton, 2020 MT 244.
“4 ¶5 The Montana Democratic Party and four petitioner signers who asked to have their signatures removed from the petition sued the Secretary, seeking an injunction to prevent the Secretary and his office from giving effect to the petition.”
Democratic Party v. Stapleton, 2020 MT 244.
“The District Court found—and none of the parties or amici disputed—the Montana Green Party was not involved and did not endorse the petition process at issue in this case at the time the signatures were gathered and presented to election administrators.”
Democratic Party v. Stapleton, No. DA 20-0396 (Mont. Aug. 19, 2020).
“of § 13-10-601(2), MCA, and thus enjoined the Secretary and all persons acting under his authority from giving any effect to the Green Party petition for ballot access.”
Byorth v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., No. 1:17-cv-00153, 2019 WL 6715970 (D. Mont. Dec. 10, 2019).
“2019) (discussing whether the legislature intended to create a private right of action for enforcing § 13-10-601(2) by declaratory judgment in connection with the UDJA).”
Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-601(2)(a): 2 cases
Larson v. State, 2019 MT 28, 434 P.3d 241.
“BACKGROUND ¶3 To be eligible to nominate candidates for election to public offices on the ballot in Montana, political parties must qualify as specified by § 13-10-601, MCA. In the case of a political party that did not have a candidate in either of the last two general…”
Democratic Party v. Stapleton, 2020 MT 244.
“4 ¶5 The Montana Democratic Party and four petitioner signers who asked to have their signatures removed from the petition sued the Secretary, seeking an injunction to prevent the Secretary and his office from giving effect to the petition.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-601(2)(b): 2 cases
Larson v. State, 2019 MT 28, 434 P.3d 241.
“BACKGROUND ¶3 To be eligible to nominate candidates for election to public offices on the ballot in Montana, political parties must qualify as specified by § 13-10-601, MCA. In the case of a political party that did not have a candidate in either of the last two general…”
Montana Green Party v. Jacobsen, No. 6:18-cv-00087 (D. Mont. Mar. 20, 2020).
“Second, a minor political party will appear on the primary election ballot if it submits a petition signed by registered voters that complies with the petition program described in Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-601 (2). Montana’s petition program includes a statewide signature…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-601(2)(c): 1 case
Larson v. State, 2019 MT 28, 434 P.3d 241.
“BACKGROUND ¶3 To be eligible to nominate candidates for election to public offices on the ballot in Montana, political parties must qualify as specified by § 13-10-601, MCA. In the case of a political party that did not have a candidate in either of the last two general…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 13-10-601(2)(d): 1 case
Larson v. State, 2019 MT 28, 434 P.3d 241.
“BACKGROUND ¶3 To be eligible to nominate candidates for election to public offices on the ballot in Montana, political parties must qualify as specified by § 13-10-601, MCA. In the case of a political party that did not have a candidate in either of the last two general…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.