2-9-302. Time for filing -- limitation of actions. A claim against the state or a political subdivision is subject to the limitation of actions provided by law.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 2-9-302 (2026)
Time For Filing -- Limitation Of Actions
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 2. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE AND ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER 9. LIABILITY EXPOSURE AND INSURANCE COVERAGE
Part 3. Claims and Actions
Time For Filing -- Limitation Of Actions
History: En. 82-4312.1 by Sec. 7, Ch. 360, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 82-4312.1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Est. of Woody ex rel. Woody v. Big Horn Cnty., 2016 MT 180, 376 P.3d 127.
Est. of Woody ex rel. Woody v. Big Horn Cnty., 2016 MT 180, 376 P.3d 127. “” Section 2-9-302, MCA. ¶10 Section 2-9-301, MCA, sets forth administrative claim requirements for actions against the State and political subdivisions.”
Rouse v. Anaconda-Deer Lodge Cnty., 817 P.2d 690 (Mont. 1991). “We hold that under §§ 2-9-302 and 27-2-209(3), MCA, the initial period of limitation for claims against a county is tolled upon timely filing of the claim and the six month period of limitation for filing an action in district court does not begin to run until the claimant…”
Nelson v. Twin Bridges High Sch., 593 P.2d 722 (Mont. 1979). “1947, now section 2-9-302 MCA. The statute of limitations on personal injury actions remains at three years.”
Vehrs v. Moses, 716 P.2d 207 (Mont. 1986). “Section 2-9-302, MCA, (1978) provides claim filing is governed by statutes of limitation governing other actions.”
Est. of Michael Ostby v. Yellowstone Cnty., No. 1:17-cv-00124 (D. Mont. Aug. 14, 2020). “§ 2-9-302, MCA; Woody, 9; Rouse v. Anaconda-Deer Lodge Cnty.”
Sugg v. Boyer, No. 4:24-cv-00070 (D. Mont. Aug. 7, 2025). “” Mont. Code Ann. § 2-9-302 . All claims against a political subdivision like Valley County must “be presented to and filed with the clerk or secretary of the political subdivision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.