25-13-102. Repealed. Sec. 18, Ch. 515, L. 2001.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 25-13-102 (2026)
Repealed
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 25. CIVIL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 13. EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT
Part 1. Right to Enforcement of Judgment
Repealed
History: En. Sec. 7, p. 51, L. 1874; re-en. Sec. 813, 1st Div. Rev. Stat. 1879; re-en. Sec. 349, 1st Div. Comp. Stat. 1887; en. Sec. 1215, C. Civ. Proc. 1895; re-en. Sec. 6818, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 9421, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. C. Civ. Proc. Sec. 685; re-en. Sec. 9421, R.C.M. 1935; R.C.M. 1947, 93-5807.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1987–1995 · leading case: Jones v. Arnold, 900 P.2d 917 (Mont. 1995).
Jones v. Arnold, 900 P.2d 917 (Mont. 1995). “To summarize the following discussion, Montana law provides in separate statutes that a judgment may be enforced for a period of 10 years from docketing, § 27-2-201(l), MCA; that a writ of execution may be issued to enforce a judgment for a period of 6 years from entry, §…”
Robinson v. First Wyoming Bank, NA, 909 P.2d 689 (Mont. 1995). “Our holding in Issue 2 that the December 16, 1994, writ of execution was defective does not render this point moot since the transcript of judgment was properly filed pursuant to § 25-9-303(1), MCA, and the bank could request leave of court to have the clerk of court issue a…”
Welch v. Huber, 862 P.2d 1180 (Mont. 1993). “In light of the above statute and § 25-13-102, MCA, motions to extend the time for executions of district court judgments past six years from the date the judgments are entered are permissible, as long as the total time period does not extend past the judgment’s ten-year…”
Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Fulb, 907 P.2d 956 (Mont. 1995). “Under § 25-13-101, MCA, a party has six years in which to execute a judgment, but § 25-13-102, MCA, provides that a judge may extend the time allotted for execution.”
First Nat'l Bank of Ekalaka v. S, 731 P.2d 1323 (Mont. 1987). “Hereford filed a motion in the Fourth Judicial District March 26, 1982, for leave to execute, pursuant to Section 25-13-102, MCA. The motion was noticed and heard.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.