Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 27. CIVIL LIABILITY, REMEDIES, AND LIMITATIONS · CHAPTER 30. NUISANCES · Part 2. Public Nuisances
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 27-30-202 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 27
  3. CHAPTER 30
  4. Part 2
  5. 27-30-202 Repealed

TITLE 27. CIVIL LIABILITY, REMEDIES, AND LIMITATIONS

CHAPTER 30. NUISANCES

Part 2. Public Nuisances

Repealed

27-30-202. Repealed. Sec. 12, Ch. 531, L. 2025.

History: (1)En. Sec. 4571, Civ. C. 1895; re-en. Sec. 6169, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 8649, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. Civ. C. Sec. 3491; Based on Field Civ. C. Sec. 1956; re-en. Sec. 8649, R.C.M. 1935; Sec. 57-108, R.C.M. 1947; (2)En. Sec. 4572, Civ. C. 1895; re-en. Sec. 6170, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 8650, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. Civ. C. Sec. 3492; re-en. Sec. 8650, R.C.M. 1935; Sec. 57-109, R.C.M. 1947; R.C.M. 1947, 57-108, 57-109.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1992–2019 · leading case: v. Smith-Cote (In re Cote), 2019 MT 10, 433 P.3d 221.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
v. Smith-Cote (In re Cote), 2019 MT 10, 433 P.3d 221. “…MCA ; 3 • injunctions, §§ 27-19-101 through -406, MCA ; • abatement as a remedy for public and private nuisances, §§ 27-30-202 and -301, MCA ; • partition, § 70-29-101, MCA ; 4 • mortgage foreclosure proceedings, § 71-1-222, MCA ; 5 and • constructive trusts, § 72-38-123,…”
Tally Bissell Neighbors, Inc. v. Eyrie Shotgun Ranch, LLC, 2010 MT 63, 228 P.3d 1134. “Sections 27-30-202, 301, MCA. ¶43 Injunctive relief represents a principle of equity.”
City of Billings v. Panasuk, 833 P.2d 1050 (Mont. 1992). · cites it 17× “Finally, Panasuk argues that the exclusive remedies for public nuisance, both civil and criminal, are found in § 27-30-202, MCA, which provides: 27-30-202.”
Tally Bissell Neigh. v. Eyrie Shotgun Ranch, 2010 MT 63, 228 P.3d 1134. “Sections 27-30-202, 301, MCA. ¶ 43 Injunctive relief represents a principle of equity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.