Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 28-2-403 (2026)

What Constitutes Menace

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 28. CONTRACTS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS

CHAPTER 2. CONTRACTS

Part 4. Circumstances Which Affect Validity of Apparent Consent

What Constitutes Menace

28-2-403. What constitutes menace. Menace consists in a threat of:

(1) such duress as is specified in subsections (1) and (3) of 28-2-402;

(2) unlawful and violent injury to the person or property of any such person in circumstances described in 28-2-402; or

(3) injury to the character of any such person.

History: En. Sec. 2115, Civ. C. 1895; re-en. Sec. 4976, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 7478, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. Civ. C. Sec. 1570; Field Civ. C. Sec. 755; re-en. Sec. 7478, R.C.M. 1935; R.C.M. 1947, 13-306; amd. Sec. 14, Ch. 117, L. 1979.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2011 · leading case: Valley Bank v. Hughes, 2006 MT 285, 147 P.3d 185.
Valley Bank v. Hughes, 2006 MT 285, 147 P.3d 185. · cites it 2× “Under § 30-4-212, MCA, Hughes became liable for satisfying the entire charge-back debt; thus, the promissory note does not fail for lack of consideration.”
Fronk v. Collins, 2011 MT 315, 266 P.3d 1271. · cites it 2× “” Section 28-2-403(1), (3), MCA. ¶13 Collins’ argument relies on two Montana cases.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 28-2-403(1): 1 case
Fronk v. Collins, 2011 MT 315, 266 P.3d 1271. “” Section 28-2-403(1), (3), MCA. ¶13 Collins’ argument relies on two Montana cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.