3-2-303. Term of supreme court. The supreme court may have only one term each year. The term must be held at the seat of government and must commence on the first day of January.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 3-2-303 (2026)
Term Of Supreme Court
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 3. JUDICIARY, COURTS
CHAPTER 2. SUPREME COURT
Part 3. Sessions of the Supreme Court
Term Of Supreme Court
History: En. Sec. 16, C. Civ. Proc. 1895; re-en. Sec. 6248, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 8800, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. C. Civ. Proc. Sec. 47; re-en. Sec. 8800, R.C.M. 1935; R.C.M. 1947, 93-211(part); amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 328, L. 2005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2010–2010 · leading case: Montana Consum. Fin. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Bullock, 2010 MT 185 (Mont. 2010).
Montana Consum. Fin. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Bullock, 2010 MT 185 (Mont. 2010). “Honoring this unambiguous statutory mandate, we are required to refer this proceeding to a district court for the purposes stated in § 3-2-303(3)(b)(ii), MCA. ii. The Court’s Workaround ¶44 As a practical matter, if this proceeding were referred to a district court, there would…”
Montana Consum. Fin. v. State (Mont. 2010). “Honoring this unambiguous statutory mandate, we are required to refer this proceeding to a district court for the purposes stated in § 3-2-303(3)(b)(ii), MCA. ii. The Court’s Workaround ¶44 As a practical matter, if this proceeding were referred to a district court, there would…”
Bernard Harrington v. State, 2010 MT 185 (Mont. 2010). “Honoring this unambiguous statutory mandate, we are required to refer this proceeding to a district court for the purposes stated in § 3-2-303(3)(b)(ii), MCA. ii. The Court’s Workaround ¶44 As a practical matter, if this proceeding were referred to a district court, there would…”
Bernard Harrington v. State (Mont. 2010). “Honoring this unambiguous statutory mandate, we are required to refer this proceeding to a district court for the purposes stated in § 3-2-303(3)(b)(ii), MCA. ii. The Court’s Workaround ¶44 As a practical matter, if this proceeding were referred to a district court, there would…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 3-2-303(3)(b)(ii) — 4 cases
Montana Consum. Fin. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Bullock, 2010 MT 185 (Mont. 2010). “Honoring this unambiguous statutory mandate, we are required to refer this proceeding to a district court for the purposes stated in § 3-2-303(3)(b)(ii), MCA. ii. The Court’s Workaround ¶44 As a practical matter, if this proceeding were referred to a district court, there would…”
Montana Consum. Fin. v. State (Mont. 2010). “Honoring this unambiguous statutory mandate, we are required to refer this proceeding to a district court for the purposes stated in § 3-2-303(3)(b)(ii), MCA. ii. The Court’s Workaround ¶44 As a practical matter, if this proceeding were referred to a district court, there would…”
Bernard Harrington v. State, 2010 MT 185 (Mont. 2010). “Honoring this unambiguous statutory mandate, we are required to refer this proceeding to a district court for the purposes stated in § 3-2-303(3)(b)(ii), MCA. ii. The Court’s Workaround ¶44 As a practical matter, if this proceeding were referred to a district court, there would…”
Bernard Harrington v. State (Mont. 2010). “Honoring this unambiguous statutory mandate, we are required to refer this proceeding to a district court for the purposes stated in § 3-2-303(3)(b)(ii), MCA. ii. The Court’s Workaround ¶44 As a practical matter, if this proceeding were referred to a district court, there would…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.