Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 37-3-203 (2026)

Powers And Duties -- Rulemaking Authority

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 37. PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

CHAPTER 3. MEDICINE

Part 2. Board of Medical Examiners

Powers And Duties -- Rulemaking Authority

37-3-203. Powers and duties -- rulemaking authority. (1) The board may:

(a) adopt rules necessary or proper to carry out the requirements in this chapter and of chapters covering podiatry, physician assistants, and nutritionists as set forth in Title 37, chapters 6, 20, and 25, respectively.

(b) hold hearings and take evidence in matters relating to the exercise and performance of the powers and duties vested in the board;

(c) aid the county attorneys of this state in the enforcement of parts 1 through 4 and 8 of this chapter as well as Title 37, chapters 6, 20, and 25. The board also may assist the county attorneys of this state in the prosecution of persons, firms, associations, or corporations charged with violations of the provisions listed in this subsection (1)(c).

(d) review certifications of disability and determinations of eligibility for a permit to hunt from a vehicle as provided in 87-2-803(11); and

(e) fund additional staff, hired by the department, to administer the provisions of this chapter, by increasing license fees as necessary.

(2) (a) The board shall establish a medical assistance program to assist and rehabilitate licensees who are subject to the jurisdiction of the board and who are found to be physically or mentally impaired by habitual intemperance or the excessive use of addictive drugs, alcohol, or any other drug or substance or by mental illness or chronic physical illness.

(b) The board shall ensure that a licensee who is required or volunteers to participate in the medical assistance program as a condition of continued licensure or reinstatement of licensure must be allowed to enroll in a qualified medical assistance program within this state and may not require a licensee to enroll in a qualified treatment program outside the state unless the board finds that there is no qualified treatment program in this state.

(3) (a) The board shall report annually on the number and types of complaints it has received involving physician practices in providing written certification, as defined in 16-12-502, for the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition provided for in Title 16, chapter 12, part 5. The report must contain:

(i) the number of complaints received by the board pursuant to 37-1-308;

(ii) the number of complaints for which a reasonable cause determination was made pursuant to 37-1-307;

(iii) the general nature of the complaints;

(iv) the number of investigations conducted into physician practices in providing written certification; and

(v) the number of physicians disciplined by the board for their practices in providing written certification for the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition.

(b) Except as provided in subsection (3)(c), the report may not contain individual identifying information regarding the physicians about whom the board received complaints.

(c) For each physician against whom the board takes disciplinary action related to the physician's practices in providing written certification for the use of marijuana for a debilitating medical condition, the report must include:

(i) the name of the physician;

(ii) the general results of the investigation of the physician's practices; and

(iii) the disciplinary action taken against the physician.

(d) The board shall provide the report to the economic affairs interim committee in accordance with 5-11-210 and shall make a copy of the report available on the board's website.

(4) The board may enter into agreements with other states for the purposes of mutual recognition of licensing standards and licensing of physicians from other states under the terms of a mutual recognition agreement.

History: En. Sec. 8, Ch. 338, L. 1969; amd. Sec. 94, Ch. 350, L. 1974; R.C.M. 1947, 66-1017; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 83, L. 1981; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 283, L. 1987; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 135, L. 1989; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 436, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 419, L. 1993; amd. Sec. 5, Ch. 224, L. 2003; amd. Sec. 18, Ch. 467, L. 2005; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 137, L. 2007; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 326, L. 2009; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 122, L. 2011; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 124, L. 2011; amd. Sec. 5, Ch. 154, L. 2015; amd. Sec. 7, Ch. 220, L. 2019; amd. Sec. 68, Ch. 261, L. 2021; amd. Sec. 64, Ch. 576, L. 2021; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 275, L. 2023; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 705, L. 2023; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 415, L. 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: Armstrong v. State, 1999 MT 261, 989 P.2d 364.
Armstrong v. State, 1999 MT 261, 989 P.2d 364. · cites it 4× “Indeed, the Montana Board of Medical Examiners (Board) is an entity created by the Legislature via § 2-15-1841, MCA, and given the powers and duties set forth in § 37-3-203, MCA, for the purpose of ensuring that medical licensees conform to appropriate standards of conduct and…”
Nelson v. State of Montana, 2008 MT 336, 195 P.3d 293. · cites it 6× “Section 37-3-203, MCA. As previously stated, § 37-3-305(2), MCA, allows the Board to authorize the issuance of licenses subject to terms of probation, other conditions, or limitations that it sets.”
Weems v. State, 2019 MT 98, 440 P.3d 4. · cites it 2× “See § 37-3-203, MCA (authorizing Board of Medical Examiners to adopt rules to carry out regulatory responsibilities for practice of medicine, podiatry, acupuncture, physician assistant practice, and nutritionist practice); § 37-8-202, MCA (prescribing rulemaking authority of…”
Planned Parenthood v. State, 2024 MT 227, 557 P.3d 471. · cites it 2× “Indeed, the Montana Board of Medical Examiners (Board) is an entity created by the Legislature via § 2-15-1841, MCA, and given the powers and duties set forth in § 37-3-203, MCA, for the purpose of ensuring that medical licensees conform to appropriate standards of conduct and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.