Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 40. FAMILY LAW · CHAPTER 5. ENFORCEMENT OF SUPPORT · Part 1. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (Renumbered and Repealed)
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 40-5-124 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 40
  3. CHAPTER 5
  4. Part 1
  5. 40-5-124 Repealed

TITLE 40. FAMILY LAW

CHAPTER 5. ENFORCEMENT OF SUPPORT

Part 1. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (Renumbered and Repealed)

Repealed

40-5-124. Repealed. Sec. 58, Ch. 328, L. 1993.

History: En. Sec. 23, Ch. 237, L. 1969; R.C.M. 1947, 93-2601-63.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1984–1994 · leading case: State ex rel. Dewyea v. Knapp, 674 P.2d 1104 (Mont. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Dewyea v. Knapp, 674 P.2d 1104 (Mont. 1984). · cites it 12× “" Section 40-5-124, MCA states in part: "[I]f the action is based on a support order issued by another court, a certified copy of the order shall be received as evidence of the duty of support, subject only to any defenses available to an obligor with respect to paternity…”
In re the Adoption of K.L.J.K., 730 P.2d 1135 (Mont. 1986). · cites it 3× “Section 40-5-124, MCA, State in part: “. .”
Washington ex rel. Blakeslee v. Horton, 722 P.2d 1148 (Mont. 1986). · cites it 3× “[Section 40-5-124, MCA; see, State ex rel.”
In re the Marriage of Harper, 764 P.2d 1283 (Mont. 1988). · cites it 3× “First, we note the final sentence of Section 40-5-124, MCA: “The determination or enforcement of a duty of support owed to one obligee is unaffected by any interference by another obligee with rights of custody or visitation granted by the court.”
In re the Marriage of Cox, 878 P.2d 903 (Mont. 1994). · cites it 2× “INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL RULINGS The second issue Jerry raises on appeal concerns whether the District Court erred by including various rulings in its Order of Dismissal relative to child support,; conditions as to visitation, and attorney fees and costs, when it did not hear any…”
In re the Marriage of Bronzynski, 806 P.2d 8 (Mont. 1990). · cites it 2× “While noting that child support payment cannot be modified retroactively (§ 40-4-208, MCA) and that child support and visitation are separate incidents with neither being dependent or conditional on the other (§ 40-5-124, MCA), the court found the mother was equitably estopped…”
State of North Dakota ex rel. B.J, 710 P.2d 702 (Mont. 1985). · cites it 3× “Section 40-5-124, MCA, provides that: “In any hearing for the civil enforcement of this part (RURESA), the court is governed by the rules of evidence applicable in a civil court action in the district court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.