Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 41. MINORS · CHAPTER 5. YOUTH COURT ACT · Part 6. Confidentiality of Proceedings -- Records (Renumbered and Repealed)
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 41-5-603 (2026)

Renumbered 41-5-215

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 41
  3. CHAPTER 5
  4. Part 6
  5. 41-5-603 Renumbered 41-5-215

TITLE 41. MINORS

CHAPTER 5. YOUTH COURT ACT

Part 6. Confidentiality of Proceedings -- Records (Renumbered and Repealed)

Renumbered 41-5-215

41-5-603. Renumbered 41-5-215. Sec. 47, Ch. 286, L. 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1997 · leading case: J.L. v. Kienenberger, 848 P.2d 472 (Mont. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
J.L. v. Kienenberger, 848 P.2d 472 (Mont. 1993). · cites it 4× “asked the District Court for an order releasing the records pursuant to Section 41-5-603(1)(c). The Kienenbergers then moved for a protective order, pursuant to Rule 26(c), M.”
State v. Holzworth, 651 P.2d 1255 (Mont. 1982). · cites it 6× “" Elsewhere in the chapter, section 41-5-603, MCA, allows inspection of youth court records to certain people, none of which is applicable to the issue here.”
Wicklund v. Lambert, 979 F. Supp. 1285 (D. Mont. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 41-5-502(l)(b), and disclosure of Youth Court records prior to their being sealed, Mont.Code Ann. § 41-5-603. Thus, say plaintiffs, the Montana Act does not protect the minor’s confidentiality.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 41-5-603(1)(c): 1 case
J.L. v. Kienenberger, 848 P.2d 472 (Mont. 1993). “asked the District Court for an order releasing the records pursuant to Section 41-5-603(1)(c). The Kienenbergers then moved for a protective order, pursuant to Rule 26(c), M.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 41-5-603(l)(c): 1 case
J.L. v. Kienenberger, 848 P.2d 472 (Mont. 1993). “asked the District Court for an order releasing the records pursuant to Section 41-5-603(1)(c). The Kienenbergers then moved for a protective order, pursuant to Rule 26(c), M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.