Notes of Decisions
Cited in
9
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case:
State v. Strobel, 885 P.2d 503 (Mont. 1994).
State v. Strobel, 885 P.2d 503 (Mont. 1994).
· cites it 48× “On September 29, 1993, Strobe1 moved to dismiss the informa- tion on grounds that it had not been filed within the thirty-day time period prescribed in § 46-11-203, MCA. The District Court denied that motion and also denied Strobel's motion to be released on her own recognizance.”
State v. Bailey, 655 P.2d 494 (Mont. 1982).
· cites it 9× “The defendant appeared in District Court on April 22, 1981, and moved to dismiss the information on the grounds that it was filed five days beyond the thirty day time limit set out in section 46-11-203, MCA. That information was dismissed pursuant to the defendant’s motion on…”
State v. Haller, 2013 MT 199 (Mont. 2013).
· cites it 5× “The State argues that under § 46-11-203, MCA, the time between the initial appearance and the probable cause determination is reasonable if it files an information within 30 days.”
State v. R. Butterfly, 2016 MT 195 (Mont. 2016).
· cites it 2× “See § 46-11-203, MCA. After two unsuccessful attempts, the State later filed a new information charging Bailey with the same offense.”
State v. H. Vaska, 2025 MT 168 (Mont. 2025).
· cites it 5× “” Section 46-11-203(1), MCA. If the State does not file an information “within 30 days[,]” “the court shall dismiss the prosecution.”
State v. H. Vaska, 2025 MT 168 (Mont. 2025).
· cites it 5× “” Section 46-11-203(1), MCA. If the State does not file an information “within 30 days[,]” “the court shall dismiss the prosecution.”
State v. Vanmoorsel, 2001 MT 281N (Mont. 2001).
· cites it 4× “The court noted that the dismissal was made pursuant to § 46-11-203(2), MCA, and this Court's decision in State v.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-11-203(1) — 4 cases
State v. Haller, 2013 MT 199 (Mont. 2013).
“The State argues that under § 46-11-203, MCA, the time between the initial appearance and the probable cause determination is reasonable if it files an information within 30 days.”
State v. Strobel, 885 P.2d 503 (Mont. 1994).
“On September 29, 1993, Strobe1 moved to dismiss the informa- tion on grounds that it had not been filed within the thirty-day time period prescribed in § 46-11-203, MCA. The District Court denied that motion and also denied Strobel's motion to be released on her own recognizance.”
State v. H. Vaska, 2025 MT 168 (Mont. 2025).
“” Section 46-11-203(1), MCA. If the State does not file an information “within 30 days[,]” “the court shall dismiss the prosecution.”
State v. H. Vaska, 2025 MT 168 (Mont. 2025).
“” Section 46-11-203(1), MCA. If the State does not file an information “within 30 days[,]” “the court shall dismiss the prosecution.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-11-203(2) — 2 cases
State v. Strobel, 885 P.2d 503 (Mont. 1994).
“On September 29, 1993, Strobe1 moved to dismiss the informa- tion on grounds that it had not been filed within the thirty-day time period prescribed in § 46-11-203, MCA. The District Court denied that motion and also denied Strobel's motion to be released on her own recognizance.”
State v. Vanmoorsel, 2001 MT 281N (Mont. 2001).
“The court noted that the dismissal was made pursuant to § 46-11-203(2), MCA, and this Court's decision in State v.”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 46-11-203(l) — 1 case
State v. Strobel, 885 P.2d 503 (Mont. 1994).
“On September 29, 1993, Strobe1 moved to dismiss the informa- tion on grounds that it had not been filed within the thirty-day time period prescribed in § 46-11-203, MCA. The District Court denied that motion and also denied Strobel's motion to be released on her own recognizance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.