46-13-402. Effect of order to dismiss. If the court directs the action to be dismissed, the defendant must, if in custody, be discharged and, if admitted to bail, have bail exonerated or money deposited instead of bail refunded to the defendant.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-13-402 (2026)
Effect Of Order To Dismiss
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 46. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 13. PRETRIAL MOTIONS
Part 4. Motion for Dismissal
Effect Of Order To Dismiss
History: En. 95-1706 by Sec. 1, Ch. 196, L. 1967; amd. Sec. 23, Ch. 184, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 95-1706(2); amd. Sec. 179, Ch. 800, L. 1991; Sec. 46-13-106, MCA 1989; redes. 46-13-402 by Code Commissioner, 1991.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: State ex rel. Torres v. Montana Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 877 P.2d 1008 (Mont. 1994).
State ex rel. Torres v. Montana Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 877 P.2d 1008 (Mont. 1994). “That section has since been amended, is now renumbered § 46-13-402, MCA, in both the 1991 and 1993 codes and provides that: Effect of order to dismiss.”
State v. Strobel, 885 P.2d 503 (Mont. 1994). “Section 46-13-402, MCA. Strobel has not provided persuasive authority for her contention that a dismissal under § 46-11-203(2), MCA, is with prejudice.”
Deangelo v. Souza., 520 P.3d 253 (Haw. 2022). “12(5); Mont. Code Ann. § 46-13-402 . 11 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** No court, federal or state, has interpreted the “specified time” language to mandate a fixed maximum time in all cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.