Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 46. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 15. PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE · Part 3. Discovery -- Immunity for Witnesses
Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 46-15-321 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 46
  3. CHAPTER 15
  4. Part 3
  5. 46-15-321 Repealed

TITLE 46. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

CHAPTER 15. PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE

Part 3. Discovery -- Immunity for Witnesses

Repealed

46-15-321. Repealed. Sec. 263, Ch. 800, L. 1991.

History: En. Sec. 1, Ch. 202, L. 1985.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–1999 · leading case: State ex rel. Carkulis v. Dist. Court of the Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 746 P.2d 604 (Mont. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Carkulis v. Dist. Court of the Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 746 P.2d 604 (Mont. 1987). · cites it 7× “The provisions relating to pretrial reciprocal discovery are now embodied in §§ 46-15-321 through XX-XX-XXX, MCA. In general, these statutes contain applicable definitions (§ 46-15-321); requirements for disclosure by the prosecution (§ 46-15-322); requirements for disclosure by…”
State v. Hatfield, 888 P.2d 899 (Mont. 1995). · cites it 3× “” Therefore, according to Brady , and §§ 46-15-322(l)(e), and 46-15-321(2), MCA (1989), the State would only have an affirmative duty to disclose the contract if: (a) the defense requested the information; Section 46-15-321(2), MCA (1989); and (b) if the contract could be…”
State v. Root, 1999 MT 203, 987 P.2d 1140. “In addition, as set forth above, Root expressly indicated in the omnibus hearing memorandum that he did not intend to introduce evidence of good character at trial.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-15-321(2): 1 case
State v. Hatfield, 888 P.2d 899 (Mont. 1995). “” Therefore, according to Brady , and §§ 46-15-322(l)(e), and 46-15-321(2), MCA (1989), the State would only have an affirmative duty to disclose the contract if: (a) the defense requested the information; Section 46-15-321(2), MCA (1989); and (b) if the contract could be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.