46-5-201. Repealed. Sec. 263, Ch. 800, L. 1991.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-5-201 (2026)
Repealed
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 46. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 5. SEARCH AND SEIZURE
Part 2. Search Warrants
Repealed
History: En. 95-703 by Sec. 1, Ch. 196, L. 1967; R.C.M. 1947, 95-703; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 116, L. 1979.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1980–2009 · leading case: State v. Coleman, 616 P.2d 1090 (Mont. 1980).
State v. Coleman, 616 P.2d 1090 (Mont. 1980). “The State secondly contends that the applicable statute which controls this case is section 46-5-201, MCA, which provides: “A ‘search warrant’ is an order: “(1) in writing; “(2) in the name of the state; “(3) signed by a judge; “(4) particularly describing the thing, place, or…”
State v. Peterson, 741 P.2d 392 (Mont. 1987). “Section 46-5-201, MCA, defines a search warrant: A "search warrant" is an order: (1) in writing; (2) in the name of the state; (3) signed by a judge; (4) particularly describing the thing, place, or person to be searched and the instruments, articles, or things to be seized; (5)…”
Ex Parte Jenkins, 26 So. 3d 464 (Ala. 2009). “Section 46-5-201, MCA, requires that a search warrant particularly describe "the thing, place, or person to be searched and the instruments, articles, or things to be seized.”
State v. Broell, 814 P.2d 44 (Mont. 1991). “Section 46-5-201, MCA, requires that a search warrant particularly describe “the thing, place, or person to be searched and the instruments, articles, or things to be seized.”
State v. Seaman, 771 P.2d 950 (Mont. 1989). “1947, now § 46-5-201, MCA, requires that a search warrant be directed to a peace officer.”
Collins v. State, Dept. of Just., 755 P.2d 1373 (Mont. 1988). “While Collins does allege that the search warrant is irregular on its face, he does not support this allegation with any genuine issues of material fact.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.