Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 46-5-201 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 46. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

CHAPTER 5. SEARCH AND SEIZURE

Part 2. Search Warrants

Repealed

46-5-201. Repealed. Sec. 263, Ch. 800, L. 1991.

History: En. 95-703 by Sec. 1, Ch. 196, L. 1967; R.C.M. 1947, 95-703; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 116, L. 1979.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1980–2009 · leading case: State v. Coleman, 616 P.2d 1090 (Mont. 1980).
State v. Coleman, 616 P.2d 1090 (Mont. 1980). · cites it 6× “The State secondly contends that the applicable statute which controls this case is section 46-5-201, MCA, which provides: “A ‘search warrant’ is an order: “(1) in writing; “(2) in the name of the state; “(3) signed by a judge; “(4) particularly describing the thing, place, or…”
State v. Peterson, 741 P.2d 392 (Mont. 1987). · cites it 6× “Section 46-5-201, MCA, defines a search warrant: A "search warrant" is an order: (1) in writing; (2) in the name of the state; (3) signed by a judge; (4) particularly describing the thing, place, or person to be searched and the instruments, articles, or things to be seized; (5)…”
Ex Parte Jenkins, 26 So. 3d 464 (Ala. 2009). · cites it 2× “Section 46-5-201, MCA, requires that a search warrant particularly describe "the thing, place, or person to be searched and the instruments, articles, or things to be seized.”
State v. Broell, 814 P.2d 44 (Mont. 1991). · cites it 3× “Section 46-5-201, MCA, requires that a search warrant particularly describe “the thing, place, or person to be searched and the instruments, articles, or things to be seized.”
State v. Seaman, 771 P.2d 950 (Mont. 1989). · cites it 2× “1947, now § 46-5-201, MCA, requires that a search warrant be directed to a peace officer.”
Collins v. State, Dept. of Just., 755 P.2d 1373 (Mont. 1988). · cites it 3× “While Collins does allege that the search warrant is irregular on its face, he does not support this allegation with any genuine issues of material fact.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.