69-4-604. Unlawful interference with lines. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation engaged as principal or employee in moving any house, building, derrick, or other structure, as provided in this part, to move, touch, cut, molest, or in any way interfere with any electric light, electric power, telephone, or telegraph wires, cables, messenger wires, or guy wires or any poles bearing any such wires, except in compliance with the provisions of this part.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 69-4-604 (2026)
Unlawful Interference With Lines
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 69. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND CARRIERS
CHAPTER 4. UTILITY LINES AND FACILITIES
Part 6. Movement of Structures
Unlawful Interference With Lines
History: En. Sec. 4, Ch. 55, L. 1929; re-en. Sec. 2711.4, R.C.M. 1935; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 174, L. 1937; amd. Sec. 15, Ch. 137, L. 1941; R.C.M. 1947, 24-139.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2020–2020 · leading case: Vote Solar v. PSC, 2020 MT 213.
Vote Solar v. PSC, 2020 MT 213. “I accordingly do not 45 join its Opinion but instead would reverse the District Court’s June 17, 2019 Order to Alter or Amend and direct the court to remand the matter to the PSC for further consideration in light of the flaws the Court identifies in the Commission’s analysis.”
Vote Solar v. PSC, No. DA 19-0223 (Mont. Oct. 6, 2020). “I accordingly do not join its Opinion but instead would reverse the District Court’s June 17, 2019 Order to Alter or Amend and direct the court to remand the matter to the PSC for further consideration in light of the flaws the Court identifies in the Commission’s analysis.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 69-4-604(1): 2 cases
Vote Solar v. PSC, 2020 MT 213. “I accordingly do not 45 join its Opinion but instead would reverse the District Court’s June 17, 2019 Order to Alter or Amend and direct the court to remand the matter to the PSC for further consideration in light of the flaws the Court identifies in the Commission’s analysis.”
Vote Solar v. PSC, No. DA 19-0223 (Mont. Oct. 6, 2020). “I accordingly do not join its Opinion but instead would reverse the District Court’s June 17, 2019 Order to Alter or Amend and direct the court to remand the matter to the PSC for further consideration in light of the flaws the Court identifies in the Commission’s analysis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.