All tort claims under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act and sections 16-727, 16-728, 23-175, 39-809, and 79-610 shall be filed with the clerk, secretary, or other official whose duty it is to maintain the official records of the political subdivision, or the governing body of a political subdivision may provide that such claims may be filed with the duly constituted law department of such subdivision. It shall be the duty of the official with whom the claim is filed to present the claim to the governing body. All such claims shall be in writing and shall set forth the time and place of the occurrence giving rise to the claim and such other facts pertinent to the claim as are known to the claimant.
Notes of Decisions
Millman v. Cnty. of Butler, 458 N.W.2d 207 (Neb. 1990).
· cites it 48× “) Neb.Rev.Stat. § 13-905 (Reissue 1987) provides that all tort claims must be filed and acted upon by the political subdivision against which the claim is made.”
Willis v. City of Lincoln, 441 N.W.2d 846 (Neb. 1989).
· cites it 14× “” Section 13-905 of the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act pertinently provides: All tort claims under [the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act] shall be filed with the clerk, secretary, or other official whose duty it is to maintain the official records of the political…”
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Transit Auth. of Omaha, 958 N.W.2d 378 (Neb. 2021).
· cites it 8× “In support of its motion, Metro asserted, among other things, that Great Northern failed to strictly comply with the notice requirements of the PSTCA, because it did not address its letter to the proper person whose duty it was to maintain the official records of Metro, and that…”
Saylor v. State, 944 N.W.2d 726 (Neb. 2020).
· cites it 10× “Rev. Stat. § 13-905 (Reissue 2012). 7. ____: ____.”
Jessen v. Malhotra, 665 N.W.2d 586 (Neb. 2003).
· cites it 5× “Assuming without deciding that the letter was filed with an individual or office designated in the Tort Claims Act as an authorized recipient of a claim, we conclude that the content of the letter was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of § 13-905.”
Keller v. Tavarone, 655 N.W.2d 899 (Neb. 2003).
· cites it 4× “Shortly thereafter, Keller submitted a written claim to the political subdivision on January 27, 2000, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-905 (Reissue 1997) of the Tort Claims Act.”
Keller v. Tavarone, 628 N.W.2d 222 (Neb. 2001).
· cites it 6× “See § 13-905. It was stipulated at trial that Keller was admitted to the Hospital for a hysterectomy and that no notice of tort claim was filed.”
Crown Prods. Co. v. City of Ralston, 567 N.W.2d 294 (Neb. 1997).
· cites it 4× “2d 207 (1990), we stated that the notice requirement of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 13-905 (Reissue 1991) of the Nebraska Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act is a procedural precedent to commencement of a negligence action, not a jurisdictional prerequisite for adjudication of a claim.”
Polinski v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 554 N.W.2d 636 (Neb. 1996).
· cites it 5× “§ 13-905 (Reissue 1991) of the Act requires all plaintiffs bringing a claim against a political subdivision to submit a written claim to that entity setting forth the time and place of the occurrence giving rise to the claim, along with any other pertinent facts known to the…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-905(1): 1 case
Willis v. City of Lincoln, 441 N.W.2d 846 (Neb. 1989).
“” Section 13-905 of the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act pertinently provides: All tort claims under [the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act] shall be filed with the clerk, secretary, or other official whose duty it is to maintain the official records of the political…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.