Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 18
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 18-1723 (2026)

Tenured firefighter; tenured police officer; presumption of death or disability; rebuttable

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The Legislature finds and declares the subject of this section to be a matter of general statewide concern.

(2) For purposes of this section:

(a) Tenured firefighter means any firefighter who was employed as a firefighter for at least five years by any city or village in this state, including any city with a home rule charter; and

(b) Tenured police officer means any police officer who was employed as a police officer for at least five years by any city or village in this state, including any city with a home rule charter.

(3) For any tenured firefighter or tenured police officer who suffers death or disability as a result of hypertension or heart or respiratory defect or disease, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that such death or disability resulted from accident or other cause while in the line of duty for all purposes of:

(a) The Cities of the First Class Police Officers Retirement Act;

(b) The Cities of the First Class Firefighters Retirement Act;

(c) Sections 15-1012 to 15-1027; and

(d) Any firefighter's or police officer's pension plan established pursuant to any home rule charter.

(4) Such rebuttable presumption applies to death or disability as a result of hypertension or heart or respiratory defect or disease after the tenured firefighter or tenured police officer separates from his or her applicable employment if the death or disability occurs within three months after such separation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1989–1989 · leading case: Spangler v. State, 448 N.W.2d 145 (Neb. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Spangler v. State, 448 N.W.2d 145 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 6× “His assignments of error merge to claim that the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court erred in concluding that (1) he failed to sustain his burden of proving that his employment exertion or stress contributed in some material and substantial degree to cause the disability he…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.