Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 2
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-2643.01 (2026)

License holder; prohibited acts

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A license holder shall not:

(1) Make a pesticide recommendation or use a pesticide in a manner inconsistent with the pesticide's labeling or with the restrictions on the use of the pesticide imposed by the state, the federal agency, or the federal act;

(2) Operate in a faulty, careless, or negligent manner;

(3) Refuse or neglect to keep and maintain the records required by the Pesticide Act or to make reports as required;

(4) Make false or fraudulent records, invoices, or reports;

(5) Use fraud or misrepresentation in making an application for a license or renewal of a license; or

(6) Aid or abet a license holder or an unlicensed person to evade the Pesticide Act, conspire with a license holder or an unlicensed person to evade the act, or allow the license holder's license to be used by another person.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Clark v. Sargent Irr. Dist., 311 Neb. 123 (2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Clark v. Sargent Irr. Dist., 311 Neb. 123 (2022). · cites it 7× “01 of Nebraska’s Pesticide Act, which provides in relevant part: A license holder shall not: (1) Make a pesticide recommendation or use a pesticide in a manner inconsistent with the pesticide’s labeling or with the restrictions on the use of the pesticide imposed by the state,…”
Clark v. Sargent Irr. Dist., 971 N.W.2d 298 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 7× “01 of Nebraska’s Pesticide Act, which provides in relevant part: A license holder shall not: (1) Make a pesticide recommendation or use a pesticide in a manner inconsistent with the pesticide’s labeling or with the restrictions on the use of the pesticide imposed by the state,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.