Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 23
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-2507 (2026)

Transferred to section 23-408

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

23-2507.

Transferred to section 23-408.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1974–2017 · leading case: Douglas Cnty. v. Archie, 891 N.W.2d 93 (Neb. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Douglas Cnty. v. Archie, 891 N.W.2d 93 (Neb. 2017). “23 The employee then has the opportunity to appeal that deci- sion to the Commission.24 The Commission, acting in an 16 See Blakely v.”
Douglas Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 641 N.W.2d 55 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 5× “§ 23-2510 (Reissue 1997), (2) the Commission lacked the statutory authority to order the Board to increase its portion of nonbargaining unit employee insurance premium payments pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-2507 (Reissue 1997), and (3) the April 6 order was in excess of the…”
Armstrong v. Howell, 371 F. Supp. 48 (D. Neb. 1974). · cites it 2× “Among other things, the Civil Service Act allowed the formation of a Civil Service Commission established pursuant to the act to prescribe, through its commissioners, general employment policies and procedures and regulations governing such matters as hours of work, promotions,…”
Douglas Cnty. ex rel. Douglas Cnty. Assessor's Off. v. Kowal, 708 N.W.2d 668 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 2× “The job description expressly provides that the duties are performed “[u]nder the direction of the Douglas County Assessor” and that “other related duties” may be assigned.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-2507(l)(e): 1 case
Douglas Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 641 N.W.2d 55 (Neb. 2002). “§ 23-2510 (Reissue 1997), (2) the Commission lacked the statutory authority to order the Board to increase its portion of nonbargaining unit employee insurance premium payments pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-2507 (Reissue 1997), and (3) the April 6 order was in excess of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.