Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-527 (2026)

Transferred to section 25-2807

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

24-527.

Transferred to section 25-2807.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1975–1982 · leading case: Reese ex rel. Reese v. Mayer, 253 N.W.2d 317 (Neb. 1977).
Reese ex rel. Reese v. Mayer, 253 N.W.2d 317 (Neb. 1977). “§ 24-527, R. R. S. 1943. Since the trial court found in favor of the plaintiff, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, all controverted issues of fact must be resolved in his favor, and he is entitled to the benefit of every inference that…”
Simon v. Lieberman, 226 N.W.2d 781 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 3× “” § 24-527, R. S. Supp., 1974. The parties tacitly agree that the right to appear by counsel somewhere in the proceedings must be guaranteed in order to meet the requirements of constitutional due process.”
Hodson v. Johnson, 321 N.W.2d 417 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 2× “The method of appeal from an adverse judgment of the small claims court in this case was governed by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-527 (Cum. Supp. 1980) and Neb.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.