Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1637 (2026)

Transferred to section 25-1678

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

25-1637.

Transferred to section 25-1678.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–2013 · leading case: State v. Sanders, 697 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 2005).
State v. Sanders, 697 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 15× “” On May 30, 2003, Sanders filed a motion entitled “Motion Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1637 .” Neb. Rev. Stat.”
State v. Edwards, 837 N.W.2d 81 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 2× “Edwards also asserts that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to object to the “entrapment by estoppel” instruc- tion and by failing to follow the specific procedure outlined in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1637 (Reissue 2008) to quash the jury panel.”
State v. Myers, 603 N.W.2d 378 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1637 (1) (Reissue 1995) provides that a motion for relief based on the ground of substantial failure to comply with chapter 25, article 16, must be made before the jury is sworn to try the case.”
State v. Long, 645 N.W.2d 553 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1637 (1) (Reissue 1995) provides that a motion for relief based on the ground of substantial failure to comply with chapter 25, article 16, must be made before the jury is sworn to try the case.”
State v. Covarrubias, 507 N.W.2d 248 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1637 (1) (Reissue 1989) provides that a motion for relief based on the ground of substantial failure to comply with Chapter 25, article 16, must be made before the jury is sworn to try the case.”
Schroll v. Fulton, 328 N.W.2d 780 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff’s counsel had the original jury panel list by April 23, 1981, a revised list by July 2, and the trial did not commence until July 6, 1981.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1637(1) — 1 case
State v. Sanders, 697 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 2005). “” On May 30, 2003, Sanders filed a motion entitled “Motion Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1637 .” Neb. Rev. Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.