Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1911 (2026)

Appellate jurisdiction; scope

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A judgment rendered or final order made by the district court may be reversed, vacated, or modified for errors appearing on the record.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 151 cases (32 in the last 5 years), 1947–2026 · leading case: State v. Thalken, 299 Neb. 857 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Thalken, 299 Neb. 857 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 4× “45 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1911 and 25-1912 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Loyd, 696 N.W.2d 860 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 4× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 1995).”
State Ex Rel. Reitz v. Ringer, 510 N.W.2d 294 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 8× “Thus, we are confronted with the threshold *299 question of whether the order from which this appeal was taken was final within the meaning of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1911 (Cum. Supp.1992).”
State v. Guatney, 299 N.W.2d 538 (Neb. 1980). · cites it 8× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 1979) provides that: "A judgment rendered or final order made by the district court may be reversed, vacated or modified by the Supreme Court for errors appearing on the record.”
Priesner v. Starry, 300 Neb. 81 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 3× “4 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 2016) gives this court jurisdiction to review a "judgment rendered or final order made by the district court.”
State v. Coble, 299 Neb. 434 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Ratumaimuri, 299 Neb. 887 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Burlison, 583 N.W.2d 31 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 4× “" Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 1995). When a case requires the interpretation of a statute, we have "an obligation to reach an independent, correct conclusion irrespective of the determination made by the courts below.”
State v. Abernathy, 969 N.W.2d 871 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 5× “” See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 2016) (“[a] judgment rendered or final order made by the district court may be reversed, vacated, or modified for errors appear- ing on the record”).”
O'CONNOR v. Kaufman, 582 N.W.2d 350 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 4× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 1995) provides for appellate review of final orders.”
Nateesha B. v. Samuel C. (In Re Interest of Kamiya C.), 302 Neb. 226 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “6 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 2016).”
State ex rel. Marcelo K. v. Ricky K., 912 N.W.2d 747 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1911 (Reissue 2016).”
Show all 151 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.