No appeal in any case shall operate as a supersedeas unless the appellant or appellants within thirty days after the entry of such judgment, decree, or final order execute to the adverse party a bond with one or more sureties, make a deposit of United States Government bonds with the clerk, or in lieu thereof make a cash deposit with the clerk for the benefit of the adverse party as follows:
(1) When the judgment, decree, or final order appealed from directs the payment of money, the bond, deposit of United States Government bonds, or cash deposit shall be the lesser of (a) the amount of the judgment, decree, or final order and the taxable court costs in the district court, plus the estimated amount of interest that will accrue on the judgment, decree, or final order between its date and the final determination of the cause in the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court and the estimated amount of the costs of appeal, such estimated interest to accrue and estimated court costs to be determined by the trial court, (b) fifty percent of the appellant's net worth, or (c) fifty million dollars. If an appellee proves by a preponderance of the evidence that an appellant is dissipating or diverting assets outside the ordinary course of business to avoid the payment of a judgment, the court may enter any orders necessary to protect the appellee and require the appellant to provide a bond, deposit of United States Government bonds, or cash deposit up to and including the amount required under subdivision (1)(a) of this section.
Such bond, United States Government bond, or cash deposit shall be conditioned that the appellant or appellants will prosecute such appeal without delay and pay all condemnation money and costs which may be found against him, her, or them on the final determination of the cause in the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court. When a cash deposit is made, United States Government bonds are deposited, or a bond is provided which is written by a corporate surety company authorized to do business within the State of Nebraska and the cash deposit, United States Government bonds, or supersedeas bond is approved by the trial court in which the judgment was rendered and filed in the court, the general lien of the judgment shall be dissolved;
(2) When the judgment, decree, or final order directs the execution of a conveyance or other instrument, the bond, deposit of United States Government bonds, or cash deposit shall be in such sum, not exceeding the lesser of fifty percent of the appellant's net worth or fifty million dollars, as shall be prescribed by the district court, or judge thereof in vacation, conditioned that the appellant or appellants will prosecute such appeal without delay and will abide and perform the judgment or decree rendered or final order which shall be made by the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court in the cause;
(3) When the judgment, decree, or order directs the sale or delivery of possession of real estate, the bond, deposit of United States Government bonds, or cash deposit shall be in such sum, not exceeding the lesser of fifty percent of the appellant's net worth or fifty million dollars, as the court, or judge thereof in vacation, shall prescribe, conditioned that the appellant or appellants will prosecute such appeal without delay, will not during the pendency of such appeal commit or suffer to be committed any waste upon such real estate, and will pay all costs and all rents or damages to such real estate which may accrue during the pendency of such appeal and until the appellee is legally restored thereto; and
(4) When the judgment, decree, or final order dissolves or modifies any order of injunction which has been or hereafter may be granted, the supersedeas bond, deposit of United States Government bonds, or cash deposit shall be in such reasonable sum, not exceeding the lesser of fifty percent of the appellant's net worth or fifty million dollars, as the court or judge thereof in vacation shall prescribe, conditioned that the appellant or appellants will prosecute such appeal without delay and will pay all costs which may be found against him, her, or them on the final determination of the cause in the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court. Such supersedeas bond, deposit of United States Government bonds, or cash deposit shall stay the doing of the act or acts sought to be restrained by the suit and continue such injunction in force until the case is heard and finally determined in the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court. The undertaking given upon the allowance of the injunction shall be and remain in effect until it is finally decided whether or not the injunction ought to have been granted.
The changes made to this section by Laws 2004, LB 1207, shall apply to all cases pending on or filed on or after April 16, 2004.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
37
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1956–2025 · leading case:
McCullough v. McCullough, 299 Neb. 719 (Neb. 2018).
McCullough v. McCullough, 299 Neb. 719 (Neb. 2018).
· cites it 8× “" On November 29, 2016, Wallace filed a motion to set a supersedeas bond pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (Reissue 2016).”
In Re Est. of Sehi, 772 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 6× “See, Neb.Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (Reissue 2008); Tilt-Up Concrete v.”
Edwards v. Edwards, 744 N.W.2d 243 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 6× “Jeffrey also argues that because the supersedeas bond does not contain the conditions that Dianna pay all rents or damages to the residence that may accrue during the pendency of the appeal and that she will not commit or suffer to be committed any waste upon the residence, the…”
Strunk v. Chromy-Strunk, 708 N.W.2d 821 (Neb. 2006).
· cites it 2× “2d 839 (1964), the district court denied Grant’s motion for a supersedeas bond, reasoning that the bond was not expressly provided for under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (Cum. Supp. 2002), and was therefore discretionary with the court.”
Exch. Bank v. Mid-Nebraska Comput. Servs., Inc., 199 N.W.2d 5 (Neb. 1972).
· cites it 12× “■ The defendants’ motion for new trial, based upon four general allegations of error, was overruled. At an ex parte •hearing in chambers, defendants’ counsel tendered: a ■supersedeas bond conditioned.”
Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Fed., Inc., 621 N.W.2d 502 (Neb. 2001).
· cites it 2× “Furthermore, the statute providing for a supersedeas bond where, as here, the decree orders the sale of real estate, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (3) (Reissue 1995), states: When the judgment, decree, or order directs the sale or delivery of possession of real estate, the bond,…”
Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Schmer, 448 N.W.2d 141 (Neb. 1989).
· cites it 9× “” PCA contends that her bond, although labeled a “Supersedeas Deposit,” is ineffective as a supersedeas because it fails to comply with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (3) (Reissue 1985).”
State Ex Rel. Partin v. Jensen, 279 N.W.2d 120 (Neb. 1979).
· cites it 6× “” Section 25-1916, R. R. S. 1943, provides for supersedeas bond in civil cases and specifies the terms and conditions of such supersedeas bonds in various kinds of judgments, decrees, or final orders.”
Sch. Dist. No. 65 v. McQuiston, 79 N.W.2d 413 (Neb. 1956).
· cites it 11× “intendent of Chase County, Nebraska, and do each, jointly and severally deposit herewith with the Clerk of the District Court of Perkins County, Nebraska, an order executed in accordance with the Decree of the District Court entered in this cause on December 5, 1955, to abide…”
Hall v. Hall, 126 N.W.2d 839 (Neb. 1964).
· cites it 4× “1943, that a decree of divorce shall not become final until 6 months after trial and decision, except for the purpose of review by appeal and for such purpose only the decree shall be treated as a final order as soon as rendered, provided if appeal has been instituted such…”
Buffalo Cnty. v. Kizzier, 548 N.W.2d 757 (Neb. 1996).
· cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (Reissue 1995) provides: No appeal in any case shall operate as a supersedeas unless the appellant or appellants within thirty days after the rendition of such judgment or decree or the making *189 of such final order execute to the adverse party a bond…”
Moss v. Associated Underwriters, 28 Neb. Ct. App. 739 (Neb. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 3× “With respect to the amount of the supersedeas bond, the appellants challenge the district court’s factual finding under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (1) (Reissue 2016) that Gurbacki was dissipating or diverting assets out- side the ordinary course of business to avoid the payment…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916(1) — 1 case
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916(1)(a) — 1 case
Moss v. Associated Underwriters, 28 Neb. Ct. App. 739 (Neb. Ct. App. 2020).
“With respect to the amount of the supersedeas bond, the appellants challenge the district court’s factual finding under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (1) (Reissue 2016) that Gurbacki was dissipating or diverting assets out- side the ordinary course of business to avoid the payment…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916(2) — 1 case
Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Schmer, 448 N.W.2d 141 (Neb. 1989).
“” PCA contends that her bond, although labeled a “Supersedeas Deposit,” is ineffective as a supersedeas because it fails to comply with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (3) (Reissue 1985).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916(3) — 3 cases
Edwards v. Edwards, 744 N.W.2d 243 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
“Jeffrey also argues that because the supersedeas bond does not contain the conditions that Dianna pay all rents or damages to the residence that may accrue during the pendency of the appeal and that she will not commit or suffer to be committed any waste upon the residence, the…”
Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Schmer, 448 N.W.2d 141 (Neb. 1989).
“” PCA contends that her bond, although labeled a “Supersedeas Deposit,” is ineffective as a supersedeas because it fails to comply with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916 (3) (Reissue 1985).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1916(4) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.