Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-413 (2026)

State, defined

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in sections 25-413 to 25-417, unless the context otherwise requires, state shall mean any foreign nation, and any state, district, commonwealth, territory or insular possession of the United States.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2021 · leading case: Ameritas Inv. Corp. v. McKinney, 694 N.W.2d 191 (Neb. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ameritas Inv. Corp. v. McKinney, 694 N.W.2d 191 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “§ 25-536 (Reissue 1995), and the Model Uniform Choice of Forum Act (Choice of Forum Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-413 et seq. (Reissue 1995).”
Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co. v. E.M. Pizza, Inc., 923 N.W.2d 789 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “BACKGROUND Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc. (AUCRA), brought suit against E.”
Polk Cnty. Recreational Ass'n v. Susquehanna Patriot Com. Leasing Co., 734 N.W.2d 750 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 2× “They specifically assert that the court erred in concluding (1) that the forum selection clauses in the leases were enforceable under applicable common-law principles and under Nebraska’s Model Uniform Choice of Forum Act (the Act), Neb.”
Applied Underwriters v. E.M. Pizza, 26 Neb. Ct. App. 906 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “Jurisdiction: States. A plaintiff’s choice of a forum should not be overturned except for weighty reasons, and only when trial in the chosen forum would establish oppressiveness and vexation to the defendant out of all proportion to the plaintiff’s convenience, or when the forum…”
Woodmen of the World Life Ins. v. Puccio, 499 N.W.2d 85 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “" *88 However, in 1969, Nebraska adopted the Model Uniform Choice of Forum Act, incorporated in Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 25-413 to 25-417 (Reissue 1989), which states in part: (1) If the parties have agreed in writing that an action on a controversy may be brought in this state and the…”
Woodmen of World Life Ins. Soc'y v. Puccio, 499 N.W.2d 85 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “” However, in 1969, Nebraska adopted the Model Uniform Choice of Forum Act, incorporated in Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-413 to 25-417 (Reissue 1989), which states in part: (1) If the parties have agreed in writing that an action on a controversy may be brought in this state and the…”
Amazing Home Care Servs., LLC v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assur. Co. Inc., 191 A.D.3d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2021). “[FN3] The Nebraska court dismissed the action , finding that it lacked jurisdiction over the New York domiciled plaintiffs because the RPA's forum selection clause was unenforceable pursuant to Nebraska's Choice of Forum Act (Neb Rev Stat Ann § 25-413 et seq . ; see Applied…”
Applied Underwriters v. O'Connell Landscape Maint., No. A-18-709 (Neb. Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2019). · cites it 2× “ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR Applied assigns as error: (1) the admission of the Darren Payne affidavit; (2) the finding that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over O’Connell under the note; (3) the finding that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over O’Connell under Nebraska’s…”
Original Equip. Co. v. East Coast Resources Grp., LLC, 966 F. Supp. 2d 845 (D. Neb. 2013). · cites it 2× “In opposing the motion to remand, ECR argued before Judge Zwart that the forum selection clause is unenforceable under Nebraska’s Model Uniform Choice of Forum Act,” Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 25-413 to 25-417 (filing 17 at CM/ECF pp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.