Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-913 (2026)
Motion to strike pleadings and papers from files; notice, when
✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Motions to strike pleadings and papers from the files may be made with or without notice, as the court or judge shall direct.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2022 · leading case: Hecker v. Ravenna Bank, 468 N.W.2d 88 (Neb. 1991).
Hecker v. Ravenna Bank, 468 N.W.2d 88 (Neb. 1991). “” Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-913 (Reissue 1989) (pleadings stricken), the appellees requested that the Heckers’ fifth amended petitions, in their entirety, be stricken because those petitions were “filed in direct violation of this Court’s order of February 26,1988 .”
Buttercase v. Davis, 982 N.W.2d 240 (Neb. 2022). “42 Stays are often used to regulate the court’s own proceedings or to accommodate the needs of parallel proceedings.”
Kramer v. Miskell, 544 N.W.2d 863 (Neb. 1996). “” § 25-913. *665 We have held that thereunder, a motion to strike may be directed to “a petition filed in violation of a court’s order or a rule of practice or procedure prescribed either by statute or by the court in which the petition is filed.”
Nuss ex rel. Est. of Nuss v. Alexander, 595 N.W.2d 263 (Neb. 1999). “Two Nebraska statutes permit the filing of a motion to strike: § 25-833 and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-913 (Reissue 1995). Section 25-833 provides that “redundant, scandalous or irrelevant matter” may be stricken from a pleading on a motion of the party prejudiced thereby.”
Nuss Ex Rel. Nuss v. Alexander, 595 N.W.2d 263 (Neb. 1999). “Two Nebraska statutes permit the filing of a motion to strike: § 25-833 and Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-913 (Reissue 1995). Section 25-833 provides that "redundant, scandalous or irrelevant matter" may be stricken from a pleading on a motion of the party prejudiced thereby.”
DeGeorge v. DiGiorgio's Sportswear, No. A-20-266 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2021). “§ 6-1112(f), comment; Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-913 (Reissue 2016). On a question of law, an appellate court is obligated to reach a conclusion independent of the determination reached by the court below.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.