Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 26
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 26-119 (2026)

Protection order; restraining order; violation; arrest, when

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A peace officer shall with or without a warrant arrest a person if:

(1) The officer has probable cause to believe that the person has committed a violation of a protection order described in section 26-118 or a violation of an order excluding a person from certain premises issued pursuant to section 42-357; and

(2) A petitioner or person protected by a protection order or an applicant for an order excluding a person from certain premises issued pursuant to section 42-357 provides the peace officer with a copy of such order or the peace officer determines that such an order exists after communicating with the local law enforcement agency.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1932–1986 · leading case: State v. Odd Fellows Hall Ass'n, 243 N.W. 616 (Neb. 1932).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Odd Fellows Hall Ass'n, 243 N.W. 616 (Neb. 1932). · cites it 2× “In proper construction of this language providing for an appeal from the determinations of the board of equalization, it majr be said that section 26-119, Comp. St. 1929, provides in part: “And when the claim of any person, against the county is disallowed, in whole or in part,…”
Consol. Chem. Labs. v. Cass Cnty., 3 N.W.2d 920 (Neb. 1942). · cites it 2× “The title is one for an act to amend section 26-119, Compiled Statutes of 1929, relating to claims against counties, and “to fix the time for the presentation of claims against counties.”
Schmidt v. Henderson, 27 N.W.2d 396 (Neb. 1947). “1943) and by municipal courts (§ 26-119, R. S. 1943), but district courts have no original jurisdiction in such cases.”
Zeller Sand & Gravel v. Butler Cnty., 388 N.W.2d 62 (Neb. 1986). “§ 26-119 (Supp. 1941), the precursor of present § 23-135, a petition for the allowance of a claim against a county which shows on its face that the claim was not filed with the county clerk within the stated time limit is demurrable.”
Beadle v. Harmon, 265 N.W. 18 (Neb. 1936). · cites it 2× “It follows that under these circumstances no recovery may be sustained under the statutory provisions quoted and relied upon. Lancaster County v. State, 13 Neb. 523 , 14 N.”
Coverdale & Colpitts v. Dakota Cnty., 12 N.W.2d 764 (Neb. 1944). · cites it 2× “A copy of the claim filed with the county clerk appears in the transcript but is not attached to or made a part of plaintiff’s petition.”
Verges v. Morrill Cnty., 9 N.W.2d 221 (Neb. 1943). · cites it 4× “630 ) section 26-119, Comp. St. Supp. 1941, provides: “Before any claim against a county is audited and allowed, the claimant or his agent shall verify the same by his affidavit, stating that the several items therein mentioned are just and true, and the services charged…”
Farm Inv. Co. v. Scotts Bluff Cnty., 251 N.W. 115 (Neb. 1933). · cites it 2× “No proceedings for a valid foreclosure were possible because no service could be had upon the owner of the land and there was no title holder that could be brought into court and the validity of the certificate can only be properly litigated in a proceeding begun before the…”
Woods v. Brown Cnty., 249 N.W. 601 (Neb. 1933). · cites it 2× “1929, provides: “Each warrant shall specify the amount levied and appropriated to the fund upon which it is drawn, and the amount already expended of such fund.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.