Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 27
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-1003 (2026)

Rule 1003. Admissibility of duplicate; when

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless (1) a genuine question is raised as to the authenticity of the original or (2) in the circumstances it would be unfair to admit the duplicate in lieu of the original.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1977–2015 · leading case: Gallner v. Larson, 291 Neb. 205 (Neb. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gallner v. Larson, 291 Neb. 205 (Neb. 2015). · cites it 4× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-1003 (Reissue 2008) provides: “A dupli- cate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless (1) a genuine question is raised as to the authenticity of the origi- nal or (2) in the circumstances it would be unfair to admit the duplicate in lieu of the…”
State v. Costello, 256 N.W.2d 97 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 2× “Section 27-1003, R. R. S. 1943, however, provides: ‘‘A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless (1) a genuine question is raised as to the authenticity of the original or (2) in the circumstances it would be unfair to admit the duplicate in lieu of the…”
State v. Reed, 423 N.W.2d 777 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “Defendant’s objection for insufficient foundation, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-1004 (Reissue 1985), was sustained.”
Omaha World-Herald Co. v. Nielsen, 369 N.W.2d 631 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “One such exception is Neb.Rev.Stat. § 27-1003 (Reissue 1979) which will allow a duplicate to be admitted unless there is a genuine issue of fact raised as to the authenticity of the original or to admit the duplicate would be unfair to the opposing party.”
Omaha World-Herald Co. v. Nielsen, 369 N.W.2d 631 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “Further, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-1002 (Reissue 1979) states the best evidence rule as currently recognized in Nebraska.”
State v. Frederiksen, 400 N.W.2d 225 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 3× “” One of the exceptions to this rule is that found in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-1003 (Reissue 1985).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.