Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 27
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-401 (2026)

Rule 401. Relevant evidence, defined

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 275 cases (29 in the last 5 years), 1948–2026 · leading case: State v. Rocha, 890 N.W.2d 178 (Neb. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Rocha, 890 N.W.2d 178 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 4× “401, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-401 (Reissue 2016). 11 State v.”
State v. Hernandez, 911 N.W.2d 524 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 4× “5 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 27-401 to 27-403 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Munoz, 927 N.W.2d 25 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “401, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-401 (Reissue 2016). State v.”
State v. Grant, 876 N.W.2d 639 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “401, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-401 (Reissue 2008). 35 Ford, supra note 27 .”
Snyder ex rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C., 605 N.W.2d 782 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 8× “Because the exercise of judicial discretion is implicit in determinations of relevancy and admissibility under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 27-401 (Reissue 1995), the trial court's decision will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.”
State v. Figures, 957 N.W.2d 161 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 3× “However, while statute mandates that the State endorse a list of witnesses known to it, it does not require that the State highlight a witness’ expert status.”
State v. Brown, 921 N.W.2d 804 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “W.2d at 144. We will not reverse a trial court's determination regarding the relevancy of evidence unless it constitutes an abuse of discretion.”
State v. Iromuanya, 719 N.W.2d 263 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 4× “401, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-401 (Reissue 1995), and prejudice under Neb.”
Lindsay Int'l Sales & Serv., LLC v. Wegener, 917 N.W.2d 133 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “401, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-401 (Reissue 2016). The bar for establishing evidentiary relevance is not a high one.”
State v. Vazquez, 21 N.W.3d 615 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 6× “§ 27-401 (Reissue 2016), relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
State v. Carpenter, 880 N.W.2d 630 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “Summarizing the case law, commentators generally agree that although the rules of evidence do not explicitly recognize the admissibility of contradiction evidence, admissibility can be inferred from the relevance rules, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 27-401 and 27-402 (Reissue 2008),…”
State v. Abligo, 978 N.W.2d 42 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 3× “(a) Applicability of § 27-412 Abligo argues that the videos were admissible under § 27-412, otherwise known as Nebraska’s rape shield statute, because they “depicted [A.”
Show all 275 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.