Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (2026)
Homicide; terms, defined
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in sections 28-302 to 28-306, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) Homicide shall mean the killing of a person by another;
(2) Person, when referring to the victim of a homicide, shall mean a human being who had been born and was alive at the time of the homicidal act; and
(3) Premeditation shall mean a design formed to do something before it is done.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1986–2018 · leading case: State v. Mueller, 301 Neb. 778 (Neb. 2018).
State v. Mueller, 301 Neb. 778 (Neb. 2018). “The time needed for premeditation may be so short as to be instantaneous provided that the intent to *437 act is formed before the act and not simultaneously with it." When this instruction was proposed, Mueller did not oppose the first sentence, which was based on the…”
State v. Hinrichsen, 877 N.W.2d 211 (Neb. 2016). “He contends his proposed instruction is the statutory definition of premeditation from Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (3) (Reissue 2008) and that this court has exceeded the scope of its authority by expanding on that definition in our cases.”
State v. Custer, 292 Neb. 88 (Neb. 2015). “” Custer objected to the second sentence of the definition for premeditation because it did not conform to the statutory definition of premeditation under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (Reissue 2008). The definition of premeditation in jury instruction No.”
State v. Palmer, 399 N.W.2d 706 (Neb. 1986). “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (1) (Reissue 1985).”
State v. Ash, 878 N.W.2d 569 (Neb. 2016). “0: “Premeditated/Premeditation means to form the intent to do something before it is done.”
State v. Nesbitt, 650 N.W.2d 766 (Neb. 2002). “Jury In this section of his postconviction motion, Nesbitt asserts that the district court erred (1) in failing to grant additional peremptory challenges to the defense, (2) in failing to sequester the jury during the trial, (3) in failing to individually question each…”
State v. Weaver, 677 N.W.2d 502 (Neb. 2004). “Premeditation was defined in the instmctions as “a design formed to do something before it is done.” The jury was instructed that the time needed for premeditation may be “so short as to be instantaneous provided that the intent to act is formed before the act and not…”
State v. Reynolds, 457 N.W.2d 405 (Neb. 1990). “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (3) (Reissue 1989): “Premeditation shall mean a design *676 to do something before it is done.”
State v. Drinkwalter, 493 N.W.2d 319 (Neb. 1992). “See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-302 (Reissue 1985). A person kills with "premeditated malice" if before the act causing the death occurs, he or she has formed the intent or determined to kill the victim without legal justification.”
State v. McBride, 550 N.W.2d 659 (Neb. 1996). “The definition of premeditation in McBride’s proposed instruction is exactly that which is set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (3) (Reissue 1995), while the district court’s instruction adds the statement: “The time needed for premeditation may be so short as to be…”
State v. Larsen, 586 N.W.2d 641 (Neb. 1998). “See, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (3) (Reissue 1995); State v.”
State v. Batiste, 437 N.W.2d 125 (Neb. 1989). “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (Reissue 1985). A person kills with “premeditated malice” if before the act causing the death occurs, he or she has formed the intent or determined to kill the victim without legal justification.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302(1) — 1 case
State v. Palmer, 399 N.W.2d 706 (Neb. 1986). “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (1) (Reissue 1985).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302(3) — 4 cases
State v. Custer, 292 Neb. 88 (Neb. 2015). “” Custer objected to the second sentence of the definition for premeditation because it did not conform to the statutory definition of premeditation under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (Reissue 2008). The definition of premeditation in jury instruction No.”
State v. Mueller, 301 Neb. 778 (Neb. 2018). “The time needed for premeditation may be so short as to be instantaneous provided that the intent to *437 act is formed before the act and not simultaneously with it." When this instruction was proposed, Mueller did not oppose the first sentence, which was based on the…”
State v. Hinrichsen, 877 N.W.2d 211 (Neb. 2016). “He contends his proposed instruction is the statutory definition of premeditation from Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-302 (3) (Reissue 2008) and that this court has exceeded the scope of its authority by expanding on that definition in our cases.”
State v. Mueller, 301 Neb. 778 (Neb. 2018).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.