Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-441 (2026)
Drug paraphernalia; use or possession; unlawful; penalty
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to use, or to possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia to manufacture, inject, ingest, inhale, or otherwise introduce into the human body a controlled substance in violation of sections 28-101, 28-431, and 28-439 to 28-444.
(2) Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction.
(3) A person shall not be in violation of this section if section 28-472 or 28-1701 applies.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: State v. Vanness, 300 Neb. 159 (Neb. 2018).
State v. Vanness, 300 Neb. 159 (Neb. 2018). “At the plea hearing, Vanness stated that she was present in Holt County on September 13, 2015, operating a motor vehicle with a driver's license which had been suspended for the reason that the insurance had expired.”
State v. Schriner, 303 Neb. 476 (Neb. 2019). “" MOTION TO SUPPRESS Based on the evidence, the State charged Schriner with manufacturing a controlled substance (marijuana) within 1,000 feet of a school under § 28-416, a Class II felony; possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) under § 28-416, a Class IV felony;…”
State v. Campbell, 620 N.W.2d 750 (Neb. 2001). “1998); drug paraphernalia under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-441 (Reissue 1995); resisting arrest under Neb.”
In Re Interest of Steven K., 661 N.W.2d 320 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). “2002) by possessing marijuana weighing 1 ounce or less and Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-441 (Reissue 1995) by using or possessing drug paraphernalia.”
State v. Vermuele, 492 N.W.2d 24 (Neb. 1992). “1988), a Class IV felony; possession of marijuana under 1 ounce, § 28-416(6), an infraction; and possession of drug paraphernalia, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-441 (Reissue 1989), an infraction.”
State v. Vermuele, 453 N.W.2d 441 (Neb. 1990). “1988), a Class IV felony; possession of marijuana under 1 ounce, § 28-416(6), an infraction; and possession of drug paraphernalia, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-441 (Reissue 1989), an infraction.”
State v. Beeken, 585 N.W.2d 865 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). “, both being convicted of possession of drug paraphernalia, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-441 (Reissue 1995), an infraction, with the first offense penalty being a fine of not more than $100.”
State v. Michael R., 662 N.W.2d 632 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). “In count II, the State alleged that Michael fell under § 43-247(1) in that he had used, or possessed with the intent to use, drug paraphernalia to manufacture, inject, ingest, inhale, or otherwise introduce into the human body a controlled substance, in violation of Neb. Rev.…”
State v. Sassen, 484 N.W.2d 469 (Neb. 1992). “Possession of drug paraphernalia is an infraction under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-441 (Reissue 1989). Again, § 29-435 states: “Except as provided in section 29-427, for any offense classified as an infraction, a citation shall be issued in lieu of arrest or continued custody pursuant…”
State v. Petersen, 676 N.W.2d 65 (Neb. Ct. App. 2004). “We conclude that Sassen does sustain the pat down of Petersen and the search of the pickup because even though possession of a marijuana pipe is only an infraction, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-441 (Reissue 1995), for which citations are to be issued in lieu of arrest, see Neb.”
State v. Adrian B., 658 N.W.2d 722 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). “2002), and that on the same date, Adrian used, or possessed with the intent to use, drug paraphernalia to manufacture or inject, ingest, inhale, or otherwise introduce into the human body a controlled substance, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-441 (Reissue 1995). On…”
State v. Craven, 571 N.W.2d 612 (Neb. 1997). “Based upon our de novo review, we conclude that these facts would cause a reasonable law enforcement officer to believe that Craven’s pocket contained a pipe used to smoke marijuana, the possession of which is unlawful under § 28-441. The officer was therefore justified in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.