(1) A person commits pandering if such person:
(a) Entices another person to become a prostitute;
(b) Procures or harbors therein an inmate for a house of prostitution or for any place where prostitution is practiced or allowed;
(c) Inveigles, entices, persuades, encourages, or procures any person to come into or leave this state for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery; or
(d) Receives or gives or agrees to receive or give any money or other thing of value for procuring or attempting to procure any person to become a prostitute or commit an act of prostitution or come into this state or leave this state for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery.
(2) Pandering is a Class II felony.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1982–2012 · leading case:
State v. Ruzicka, 357 N.W.2d 457 (Neb. 1984).
State v. Ruzicka, 357 N.W.2d 457 (Neb. 1984).
· cites it 8× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-802 (Reissue 1979) provides that one commits pandering if, among other things, he agrees to receive money for procuring one to commit an act of prostitution.”
State v. Cisneros, 535 N.W.2d 703 (Neb. 1995).
· cites it 4× “§ 28-320(1) (Reissue 1989); two counts of attempted pandering, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-802 (Reissue 1989); and two counts of tampering with a witness, Neb.”
Doe v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Neb. 2010).
· cites it 2× “01; (d) Incest of a minor pursuant to section 28-703; (e) Pandering of a minor pursuant to section 28-802; (f) Visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct of a child pursuant to section 28-1463.”
Doe v. Nebraska, 898 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (D. Neb. 2012).
· cites it 2× “01; (d) Incest of a minor pursuant to section 28-703; (e) Pandering of a minor pursuant to section 28-802; (f) Visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct of a child pursuant to section 28-1463.”
Mingus v. Fairbanks, 317 N.W.2d 770 (Neb. 1982).
· cites it 2× “Mingus was originally charged with the felony offense of pandering in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-802 (Reissue 1979). This is a Class IV felony.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.