Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1804.03 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

29-1804.03.

Transferred to section 23-3402.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1973–1987 · leading case: State v. Richter, 408 N.W.2d 717 (Neb. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Richter, 408 N.W.2d 717 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1804.03 (3) (Reissue 1985) (appointment of public defender to represent an indigent).”
State v. Masilko, 409 N.W.2d 322 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “Turning first to the question of the appointment of counsel, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1804.03 (Reissue 1985) provides in part: “(3) It shall also be the duty of the public defender to represent *47 all indigent persons charged with misdemeanor offenses punishable by imprisonment,…”
State v. Richter, 378 N.W.2d 175 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1804.03 (Cum. Supp. 1984) provides *492 that “[i]t shall also be the duty of the public defender to represent all indigent persons charged with misdemeanor offenses punishable by imprisonment, when appointed by the court.”
State v. Russell, 230 N.W.2d 196 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 2× “, 1974, which places the duty on the public defender to represent all indigent persons charged with, or under arrest for, criminal offenses makes the public defender the counsel for the defendant in this case at the time the defendant was interrogated.”
State v. Strickland, 306 N.W.2d 600 (Neb. 1981). · cites it 2× “, a member of the Douglas County Public Defender’s office, apparently pursuant to a standard practice and presumably in accordance with the duties placed upon the public defender by Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-1804.03 and 29-1804.”
State v. Kellogg, 204 N.W.2d 567 (Neb. 1973). · cites it 2× “After hearing and full examination of all proceedings, the court found the proposed appeal to be frivolous and permitted the withdrawal of counsel. A copy of the order was immediately served on the defendant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.