Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1902 (2026)
Return of subpoenas
✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
If the subpoena be served by such special deputy, it shall be his duty, after serving the same, to return thereon the manner in which the same was served; and also to make oath or affirmation to the truth of such return, before some person competent to administer oaths, which shall be endorsed on such writ; and the same shall be returned according to the command thereof by the person serving the same through the post office or otherwise.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2008–2020 · leading case: Frederick v. Seeba, 745 N.W.2d 342 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
Frederick v. Seeba, 745 N.W.2d 342 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “Thus, an order imposing a money judgment for attorney fees and expenses for discovery violations pursuant to *347 Nebraska's discovery rule 37(a)(4) does not affect a "substantial right" as required by § 29-1902.”
State v. Fredrickson, 939 N.W.2d 385 (Neb. 2020). “First, while the order stated Fredrickson was entitled to the appointment of appellate counsel at the County’s expense, it did not obligate the County to pay any specific amount or set a deadline for payment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.