Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2923 (2026)

Terms, defined

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of the Convicted Sex Offender Act:

(1) Aftercare treatment program shall mean any public or private facility or service which offers treatment on an outpatient basis or in a minimally restricted setting, which treatment is appropriate for a convicted sex offender after he or she has successfully completed an inpatient treatment program operated by the Department of Health and Human Services; and

(2) Convicted sex offender shall mean a person who is convicted of sexual assault in the first degree as provided in section 28-319, sexual assault in the second degree as provided in section 28-320, sexual assault of a child in the second or third degree as provided in section 28-320.01, sexual assault of a child in the first degree as provided in section 28-319.01, incest as provided in section 28-703, or attempt to commit sexual assault in the first degree pursuant to section 28-201 and sentenced to a term of imprisonment in a Department of Correctional Services adult correctional facility.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2010 · leading case: Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997). “1996-1997) Sometimes No Yes *398 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2923 et seq. (Supp. 1996) No No Generally not N.”
United States v. Comstock, 560 U.S. 126 (2010). “); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2923 et seq. (2008); N.”
State v. Wragge, 524 N.W.2d 54 (Neb. 1994). “§ 29-2923(2).) Further, it specifies how to deal with those previously committed as mentally disordered sex offenders.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2923(2): 1 case
State v. Wragge, 524 N.W.2d 54 (Neb. 1994). “§ 29-2923(2).) Further, it specifies how to deal with those previously committed as mentally disordered sex offenders.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.