As used in sections 29-3301 to 29-3307, the terms identifying physical characteristics or identification procedures shall include but not be limited to fingerprints, palm prints, footprints, measurements, handwriting exemplars, lineups, hand printing, voice samples, blood samples, urine samples, saliva samples, hair samples, comparative personal appearance, and photographs of an individual.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
13
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2022 · leading case:
State v. Evans, 338 N.W.2d 788 (Neb. 1983).
State v. Evans, 338 N.W.2d 788 (Neb. 1983).
· cites it 6× “On July 30, 1982, an affidavit prepared by a Nebraska state patrolman was submitted to the District Court, seeking an order pursuant to the identifying physical characteristics act, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 29-3301 et seq. (Reissue 1979), to compel defendant to submit to fingerprinting…”
State v. McKinney, 730 N.W.2d 74 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “CONCLUSION We conclude that the district court erred in not suppressing identifying physical characteristics evidence obtained in violation of the IPCS. However, we conclude that such error was harmless.”
State v. Buckman, 613 N.W.2d 463 (Neb. 2000).
· cites it 2× “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3301 (Reissue 1995), the term “identifying physical characteristics” includes saliva samples.”
State v. Pope, 943 N.W.2d 294 (Neb. 2020).
· cites it 2× “In April 2016, Marcella was at the Douglas County courthouse with a friend for reasons unrelated to this case.”
State v. Swayze, 247 N.W.2d 440 (Neb. 1976).
· cites it 4× “Robinson, filed an affidavit of peace officer in the District Court for Kimball County, Nebraska, pursuant to the Nebraska Identifying Physical Characteristics Act, sections 29-3301 to 29-3307, R. R. S. 1943, requesting an order requiring four parties, including the defendant,…”
State v. Freeman, 571 N.W.2d 276 (Neb. 1997).
· cites it 2× “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3301 (Reissue 1995), the term “identifying physical characteristics” includes blood samples and saliva samples.”
State v. Marcus, 660 N.W.2d 837 (Neb. 2003).
· cites it 3× “The identifying physical characteristics statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3301 to 29-3307 (Reissue 1995), require a showing of probable cause to believe the person seized has engaged in an articulable criminal offense before the judicial officer can issue an order to produce…”
People v. Harris, 762 P.2d 651 (Colo. 1988).
· cites it 2× “§ 13-3905 (1978); Idaho Code § 19-625 (1987); Iowa Code chapter 810 (1987); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-3301 to -3307 (1985); N.”
State v. McCurry, 424 N.W.2d 364 (Neb. 1988).
· cites it 3× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3301 et seq. (Reissue 1985) (“Identifying Physical Characteristics Act,” which prescribes a procedure for obtaining data from an individual for identification).”
State v. Prior, 973 N.W.2d 726 (Neb. Ct. App. 2022).
“Testimony of Jacquilyn and Angelique Prior next assigns that the district court erred in allowing the testimony of Jacquilyn and Angelique, which was a violation of § 27-404. [20] In proceedings where the Nebraska Evidence Rules apply, the admissibility of evidence is controlled…”
In re RH, 762 A.2d 1239 (Vt. 2000).
“1988); Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 29-3301 to -3307 (1985); N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.