Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-729 (2026)

Terms, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where appearing in sections 29-729 to 29-758, the term Governor includes any person performing the functions of Governor by authority of the law of this state. The term Executive Authority includes the Governor, and any person performing the functions of Governor in a state other than this state, and the term State, referring to a state other than this state, includes any other state or territory, organized or unorganized, of the United States of America.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1977–2007 · leading case: State v. Steele, 624 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Steele, 624 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 2× “Steele was taken into custody and waived extradition to Colorado under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-729 to 29-758 (Reissue 1995) (Extradition Act).”
State v. Rieger, 708 N.W.2d 630 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 2× “are much more akin to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-729 to 29-765 (Reissue 1979), referring to interstate detainers,” and set out “a different time-frame from that set out in Neb.”
State v. Soule, 379 N.W.2d 762 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 2× “are much more akin to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-729 to 29-765 (Reissue 1979), referring to interstate detainers, as discussed in State v.”
State v. Hernandez, 730 N.W.2d 96 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 2× “7 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-729 et seq. (Reissue 1995 & Cum.”
State v. Costello, 256 N.W.2d 97 (Neb. 1977). “In summary, defendant contends that he was not arrested on a proper Governor’s warrant, that the arresting officers in Florida violated his constitutional rights, and that the provisions of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, sections 29-729 to 29-758, R. R. S. 1943, were not…”
Koenig v. Poskochil, 469 N.W.2d 523 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 4× “The provisions of the act are codified in Nebraska at Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-729 to 29-758 (Reissue 1989) and in South Dakota at S.”
State v. Steele, 578 N.W.2d 508 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “This would include rights under the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, codified in Nebraska in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-729 et seq. (Reissue 1995).”
Radant v. Vargason, 368 N.W.2d 483 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “The petitioner contends that the district court erred in finding that the documents submitted by the State of Colorado complied with the provisions of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-729 et seq. (Reissue 1979 & Cum.”
Wickline v. Gunter, 448 N.W.2d 584 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “The State of North Dakota has not requested the transfer of Wickline for trial in North Dakota through either the Agreement on Detainers or the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-729 to 29-758(Reissue 1985).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.