Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 3
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-304 (2026)

Joint airport zoning board; airport zoning regulation; filing

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If an airport is owned or controlled by a political subdivision and any airport hazard area appertaining to such airport is located outside of the political subdivision's zoning jurisdiction, the political subdivision owning or controlling the airport and the political subdivision or political subdivisions within whose zoning jurisdiction the airport hazard area or areas are located may, by ordinance or resolution duly adopted, create a joint airport zoning board, which board shall have the same power to adopt, by resolution approved by a majority of the board, airport zoning regulations applicable to an airport hazard area as that vested by section 3-303 in any political subdivision within whose zoning jurisdiction such area is located. Any airport zoning regulation, or any amendment thereto, adopted by a joint airport zoning board shall be filed with the official or administrative agency responsible for the enforcement of zoning regulations in each of the political subdivisions participating in the creation of the joint airport zoning board and shall be enforced as provided in section 3-319.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2021–2026 · leading case: State ex rel. Couns. for Dis. v. Beauvais, 956 N.W.2d 298 (Neb. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Couns. for Dis. v. Beauvais, 956 N.W.2d 298 (Neb. 2021). “704 § 3-304 of the disciplinary rules provides that the following may be considered as discipline for attorney misconduct: (A) Misconduct shall be grounds for: (1) Disbarment by the Court; or (2) Suspension by the Court; or (3) Probation by the Court in lieu of or subsequent to…”
State ex rel. Couns. for Dis. v. McCarty, 321 Neb. 484 (2026). “The respondent’s inactive membership status already protects the public in Nebraska.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-304(B): 1 case
State ex rel. Couns. for Dis. v. McCarty, 321 Neb. 484 (2026). “The respondent’s inactive membership status already protects the public in Nebraska.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.