Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 30
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2629 (2026)

Proceedings subsequent to appointment; venue

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Unless otherwise provided in the Nebraska Uniform Adult Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Jurisdiction Act, the court where the ward resides has concurrent jurisdiction with the court which appointed the guardian, or in which acceptance of a testamentary appointment was filed, over resignation, removal, accounting, and other proceedings relating to the guardianship.

(b) Unless otherwise provided in the Nebraska Uniform Adult Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Jurisdiction Act, if the court located where the ward resides is not the court in which acceptance of appointment is filed, the court in which proceedings subsequent to appointment are commenced shall in all appropriate cases notify the other court, in this or another state, and after consultation with that court determine whether to retain jurisdiction or transfer the proceedings to the other court, whichever may be in the best interest of the ward. A copy of any order accepting a resignation or removing a guardian shall be sent to the court in which acceptance of appointment is filed.

(c) Any action or proposed action by a guardian may be challenged at any time by any interested person.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2021 · leading case: In re Guardianship of Nicholas H., 309 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Guardianship of Nicholas H., 309 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “§ 30-2625 (Reissue 2016) (requiring that in proceeding for appointment or removal of guardian, notice should be given to, inter alia, parents of ward); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2629 (Reissue 2016) (“[a]ny action or proposed action by a guardian may be challenged at any time by any…”
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Miller, 620 P.2d 800 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). ““(b) If the court located where the ward resides is not the court in which acceptance of appointment is filed, the court in which proceedings subsequent to appointment are commenced shall in all appropriate cases notify the other court, in this or another state, and after…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.