(1) A power of attorney
executed in this state on or after January 1, 2013, is valid if its execution
complies with section 30-4005. The county court and the district court of
the principal's domicile shall have concurrent jurisdiction to determine the
validity and enforceability of a power of attorney.
(2) A power of attorney
executed in this state before January 1, 2013, is valid if its execution complied
with the law of this state as it existed at the time of execution.
(3) A power of attorney
executed other than in this state is valid in this state if, when the power
of attorney was executed, the execution complied with:
(a) The law of the jurisdiction
that determines the meaning and effect of the power of attorney pursuant to
section 30-4007; or
(b)
The requirements for a military power of attorney pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1044b,
as amended.
(4)
Except as otherwise provided by statute other than the Nebraska Uniform Power
of Attorney Act, a photocopy or electronically transmitted copy of an original
power of attorney has the same effect as the original.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case:
In re Est. of Adelung, 947 N.W.2d 269 (Neb. 2020).
In re Est. of Adelung, 947 N.W.2d 269 (Neb. 2020).
· cites it 7× “314—which added § 24-517(13)— was not intended to make any substantive changes to county court jurisdiction. He first notes the introducer’s statement that the purpose of L.”
In re Est. of Adelung, 947 N.W.2d 269 (Neb. 2020).
· cites it 7× “314—which added § 24-517(13)— was not intended to make any substantive changes to county court jurisdiction. He first notes the introducer’s statement that the purpose of L.”
Kimball v. Rosedale Ranch, 24 N.W.3d 841 (Neb. 2025).
“[4,5] Under the doctrine of jurisdictional priority, when different state courts have concurrent original jurisdiction over the same subject matter, basic principles of judicial administration require that the first court to acquire jurisdiction should retain it to the exclusion…”
Kimball v. Rosedale Ranch, 24 N.W.3d 841 (Neb. 2025).
“[4,5] Under the doctrine of jurisdictional priority, when different state courts have concurrent original jurisdiction over the same subject matter, basic principles of judicial administration require that the first court to acquire jurisdiction should retain it to the exclusion…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-4006(1): 2 cases
In re Est. of Adelung, 947 N.W.2d 269 (Neb. 2020).
“314—which added § 24-517(13)— was not intended to make any substantive changes to county court jurisdiction. He first notes the introducer’s statement that the purpose of L.”
In re Est. of Adelung, 947 N.W.2d 269 (Neb. 2020).
“314—which added § 24-517(13)— was not intended to make any substantive changes to county court jurisdiction. He first notes the introducer’s statement that the purpose of L.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.