Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-206 (2026)

Official election calendar; publish; contents; delivery of copy; filing or other acts; time

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The Secretary of State shall publish an official election calendar by November 1 prior to the statewide primary election. Such calendar, to be approved as to form by the Attorney General, shall set forth the various election deadline dates and other pertinent data as determined by the Secretary of State. The official election calendar shall be merely a guideline and shall in no way legally bind the Secretary of State or the Attorney General.

(2) The Secretary of State shall deliver a copy of the official election calendar to the state party headquarters of each recognized political party within ten days after publication under subsection (1) of this section.

(3) Except as provided in sections 32-302, 32-304, and 32-306, any filing or other act required to be performed by a specified day shall be performed by 5 p.m. of such day, except that if such day falls upon a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, performance shall be required on the next business day.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2026–2026 · leading case: Burbank v. Evnen, 32 N.W.3d 612 (Neb. 2026).
Burbank v. Evnen, 32 N.W.3d 612 (Neb. 2026). · cites it 3× “Mandamus Relief Burbank’s primary argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying her request for a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the Secretary to include her name as a Democratic Party candidate for the U.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-206(1): 1 case
Burbank v. Evnen, 32 N.W.3d 612 (Neb. 2026). “Mandamus Relief Burbank’s primary argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying her request for a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the Secretary to include her name as a Democratic Party candidate for the U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.