Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (2026)
Transferred to section 60-6,110
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
39-604.
Transferred to section 60-6,110.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1977–1992 · leading case: State v. Ryland, 486 N.W.2d 210 (Neb. 1992).
State v. Ryland, 486 N.W.2d 210 (Neb. 1992). “Furthermore, had he not obeyed these signals from the deputy, Ryland could have been in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1988), which provides that “[a]ny person who knowingly fails or refuses to obey any lawful order of any law enforcement officer who is *78…”
Fulmer v. Jensen, 379 N.W.2d 736 (Neb. 1986). “2d 138 (1985), we held that under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1984), a person driving in response to a lawful order by a law enforcement officer is engaged in privileged conduct for which he cannot be punished.”
State v. Lichti, 367 N.W.2d 138 (Neb. 1985). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1984) provides: “Any person who knowingly fails or refuses to obey any lawful order of any law enforcement officer who is controlling or directing traffic shall be guilty of a traffic infraction.”
State v. Knoles, 256 N.W.2d 873 (Neb. 1977). “A perusal of the rules shows that only a few offenses are expressly declared to be misdemeanors: Sections 39-604(2); 39-619.01; 39-668; 39-669.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604(1) — 2 cases
State v. Ryland, 486 N.W.2d 210 (Neb. 1992). “Furthermore, had he not obeyed these signals from the deputy, Ryland could have been in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1988), which provides that “[a]ny person who knowingly fails or refuses to obey any lawful order of any law enforcement officer who is *78…”
State v. Lichti, 367 N.W.2d 138 (Neb. 1985). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1984) provides: “Any person who knowingly fails or refuses to obey any lawful order of any law enforcement officer who is controlling or directing traffic shall be guilty of a traffic infraction.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604(2) — 1 case
State v. Knoles, 256 N.W.2d 873 (Neb. 1977). “A perusal of the rules shows that only a few offenses are expressly declared to be misdemeanors: Sections 39-604(2); 39-619.01; 39-668; 39-669.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.