Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (2026)

Transferred to section 60-6,110

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

39-604.

Transferred to section 60-6,110.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1977–1992 · leading case: State v. Ryland, 486 N.W.2d 210 (Neb. 1992).
State v. Ryland, 486 N.W.2d 210 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 4× “Furthermore, had he not obeyed these signals from the deputy, Ryland could have been in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1988), which provides that “[a]ny person who knowingly fails or refuses to obey any lawful order of any law enforcement officer who is *78…”
Fulmer v. Jensen, 379 N.W.2d 736 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 2× “2d 138 (1985), we held that under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1984), a person driving in response to a lawful order by a law enforcement officer is engaged in privileged conduct for which he cannot be punished.”
State v. Lichti, 367 N.W.2d 138 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1984) provides: “Any person who knowingly fails or refuses to obey any lawful order of any law enforcement officer who is controlling or directing traffic shall be guilty of a traffic infraction.”
State v. Knoles, 256 N.W.2d 873 (Neb. 1977). “A perusal of the rules shows that only a few offenses are expressly declared to be misdemeanors: Sections 39-604(2); 39-619.01; 39-668; 39-669.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604(1) — 2 cases
State v. Ryland, 486 N.W.2d 210 (Neb. 1992). “Furthermore, had he not obeyed these signals from the deputy, Ryland could have been in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1988), which provides that “[a]ny person who knowingly fails or refuses to obey any lawful order of any law enforcement officer who is *78…”
State v. Lichti, 367 N.W.2d 138 (Neb. 1985). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604 (1) (Reissue 1984) provides: “Any person who knowingly fails or refuses to obey any lawful order of any law enforcement officer who is controlling or directing traffic shall be guilty of a traffic infraction.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-604(2) — 1 case
State v. Knoles, 256 N.W.2d 873 (Neb. 1977). “A perusal of the rules shows that only a few offenses are expressly declared to be misdemeanors: Sections 39-604(2); 39-619.01; 39-668; 39-669.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.