Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 4
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 4-210 (2026)

Acts prohibited; violations; civil penalty; postsecondary educational institution; powers and duties; injunction; Attorney General; powers and duties; political activities; unlawful acts

✓ text as last checked July 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1)(a) A person shall not:

(i) Willfully violate any provision of the Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act or any rule or regulation under the act; or

(ii) In any registration statement, supplement to such statement, or any other document filed with or furnished to the Attorney General under the act, willfully make a false statement of a material fact.

(b) A person who violates this subsection shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to fifty thousand dollars. The total civil penalties a person may be required to pay under this subsection shall not exceed fifty thousand dollars for any violations occurring in the same calendar year. All penalties collected under this section shall be remitted to the State Treasurer for distribution in accordance with Article VII, section 5, of the Constitution of Nebraska.

(2) If a person found to be in violation of subsection (1) of this section is a student, a faculty member, a researcher, or an adjunct or is otherwise employed by or associated with a postsecondary educational institution, such person may be expelled or dismissed from any role with any postsecondary educational institution in Nebraska and may be prohibited from entering any campus of such an institution in this state. It shall be the purview of the postsecondary educational institution to establish appropriate responses to violations of subsection (1) of this section.

(3) Each postsecondary educational institution in Nebraska shall adopt a policy regarding any permanent expulsion and dismissal of persons found to be in violation of subsection (1) of this section.

(4) In any proceeding under the act brought by the Attorney General in which it is alleged that a person is an agent of a foreign principal from an adversary nation or a foreign terrorist organization, the specific identity of the principal shall be alleged and it shall be the burden of the Attorney General to prove such identity.

(5) Failure to file any registration statement or supplements to such statement as required by section 4-204 shall be considered a continuing violation for as long as such failure exists, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or other statute to the contrary.

(6) Whenever, in the judgment of the Attorney General, any person has engaged in any act or practice that constitutes a violation of the Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act or any rule or regulation under the act, the Attorney General may apply to the district court for an order enjoining such acts or practices or for an order directing compliance. Upon a showing by the Attorney General that such person has engaged in any such acts or practices, the court may issue a temporary or permanent injunction, restraining order, or such other order that it may deem proper.

(7) If the Attorney General determines that a registration statement does not comply with the requirements of the Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act or the rules and regulations adopted and promulgated under the act, the Attorney General shall notify the registrant in writing, specifying in what respects the statement is deficient. No person shall act as an agent of a foreign principal from an adversary nation or a foreign terrorist organization at any time ten days or more after receipt of such notification without filing an amended registration statement in full compliance with the requirements of the act and the rules and regulations adopted and promulgated under the act.

(8) It shall be unlawful for any agent of a foreign principal from an adversary nation or a foreign terrorist organization required to register under the Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act to be a party to any contract, agreement, or understanding, either express or implied, with such foreign principal pursuant to which the amount or payment of the compensation, fee, or other remuneration of such agent is contingent, in whole or in part, upon the success of any political activities carried on by such agent.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2021 · leading case: Pearrow v. Pearrow, 928 N.W.2d 430 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pearrow v. Pearrow, 928 N.W.2d 430 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “Section 4-210 allows for adjustments in child support related to parenting time when support is not calculated under joint physical custody and parenting time substantially exceeds alternating weekends and holidays and 28 days or more in any 90-day period.”
Hotz v. Hotz, 917 N.W.2d 467 (Neb. 2018). “32 The court found an adjustment was warranted under § 4-210 because James had physical custody of the parties' younger children; Josee would reach the age of majority before the coming summer; and the alternating custody during June, July, *478 and August would substantially…”
Pearson v. Pearson, 828 N.W.2d 760 (Neb. 2013). “”11 Based upon our holding in Rutherford, we remand this cause to the district court with directions to complete the applicable worksheets and provide evidence in the court order of the calculations used to deter- mine child support.”
Pearrow v. Pearrow, 27 Neb. Ct. App. 209 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “Section 4-210 allows for adjustments in child support related to parenting time when support is not calculated under joint physical custody and parenting time substantially exceeds alternating weekends and holidays and 28 days or more in any 90-day period.”
Pearrow v. Pearrow, 27 Neb. Ct. App. 209 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “Section 4-210 allows for adjustments in child support related to parenting time when support is not calculated under joint physical custody and parenting time substantially exceeds alternating weekends and holidays and 28 days or more in any 90-day period.”
State on behalf of Andreasen v. Andreasen, No. A-19-929 (Neb. Ct. App. Aug. 18, 2020). · cites it 4× “That parenting time exceeds 28 days in a 90-day period and therefore § 4-210 provides for a reduction of support payments by up to 80 percent during that - 14 - time.”
State on behalf of Andreasen v. Andreasen, No. A-19-929 (Neb. Ct. App. Aug. 18, 2020). · cites it 4× “That parenting time exceeds 28 days in a 90-day period and therefore § 4-210 provides for a reduction of support payments by up to 80 percent during that - 14 - time.”
Carter v. Thompson, No. A-18-1189 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2020). · cites it 3× “Jason asserts that the district court erred in declining to allow him a deduction for travel expenses associated with his parenting time pursuant to § 4-210. The court declined to allow any downward deviation for travel expenses because each party was required to incur travel…”
Passauer v. Kelley, No. A-14-1007 (Neb. Ct. App. Dec. 29, 2015). · cites it 4× “Kathryn’s child support obligation during the summer months can be reduced pursuant to § 4-210, which states in part: an adjustment in child support may be made at the discretion of the court when visitation or parenting time substantially exceeds alternating weekends and…”
James-Estenson v. Estenson, No. A-16-846 (Neb. Ct. App. Nov. 21, 2017). “Unfortunately, the record is unclear regarding the circumstances surrounding that action.”
Brady v. Ruelas, No. A-17-423 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 2, 2018). “Her proposed joint custody-child support calculation, Worksheet 3 (exhibit 13, pages 2 and 3), shows Daniel’s child support obligation to be $409 per month for two children, and $310 per month for one child; this is a reduction of approximately 46- to 49-percent from the regular…”
Hotz v. Hotz, 301 Neb. 102 (Neb. 2018). “32 The court found an adjustment was warranted under § 4-210 because James had physical custody of the parties’ younger children; Josee would reach the age of majority before the coming summer; and the alternating custody during June, July, and August would substantially exceed…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.