Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 4-212 (2026)
Attorney General; website; contents
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) In order to increase public transparency, the Attorney General shall provide information about agents of foreign principals registered in Nebraska on a portal of the Attorney General's website. The portal shall contain the information about each registrant and each registrant's activities within the State of Nebraska.
(2) The Attorney General may exchange data with government officials in other states and the federal government in order to increase the transparency and registration compliance of foreign principals from adversary nations or foreign terrorist organizations that operate in multiple states.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: State on behalf of Kaaden S. v. Jeffery T., 303 Neb. 933 (Neb. 2019).
State on behalf of Kaaden S. v. Jeffery T., 303 Neb. 933 (Neb. 2019). “86 Section 4-212 of the guidelines explains when, and how, worksheet 3 is to be utilized: When a specific provision for joint physical custody is ordered and each party's parenting time exceeds 142 days per year, it is a rebuttable presumption that support shall be calculated…”
Leners v. Leners, 302 Neb. 904 (Neb. 2019). “We do not agree that § 4-212 requires a trial judge to grant one parent carte blanche to compel the other parent to pay (either wholly or partially) for every conceivable extracurricular activity for a child.”
Hotz v. Hotz, 301 Neb. 102 (Neb. 2018). “§ 4-210 of the NCSG specifically addresses adjustments in child support related to visitation: If child support is not calculated under § 4-212 [joint physical custody], an adjustment in child support may be made at the discretion of the court when visitation or parenting time…”
Berman v. United States Nat'l Bank, 249 N.W.2d 187 (Neb. 1976). “The right to charge back terminates if and when a settlement received becomes final, § 4-212, U.C.C., because of final payment by the payor bank.”
Donald v. Donald, 296 Neb. 123 (Neb. 2017). “14 In the same way, a state court cannot include the amount of military retirement pay 12 See, Neb.”
Scott v. Dorrance, 995 N.W.2d 226 (Neb. Ct. App. 2023). “The court further ordered that “pursuant to §4-212 of the Nebraska Child Support Guidelines, all reasonable and necessary direct expenditures made solely for the children including but not - 221 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 32 Nebraska Appellate Reports SCOTT V.”
Pearrow v. Pearrow, 27 Neb. Ct. App. 209 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). “Wendy is correct that if child support is determined under a joint physical custody calculation, "all reasonable and necessary direct expenditures made solely for the child(ren) such as clothing and extracurricular activities shall be allocated between the parents.”
Conley v. Conley, 33 Neb. Ct. App. 98 (Neb. Ct. App. 2024). “Aside from the therapy ordered for Sophie, our review of the orders reflects only an order for payment of 25 percent of extracurricular activities for Charlie and Sophie, and we find no abuse of discretion in this regard.”
Avery v. Whittle, 34 Neb. Ct. App. 126 (Neb. Ct. App. 2026). “Although the plain language of § 4-212 may suggest otherwise, this court has held that the joint physical custody worksheet may be proper “when the threshold amount of parenting time is met, even if no specific provision for joint physical custody is ordered.”
Hudson v. Hudson, 988 N.W.2d 179 (Neb. Ct. App. 2023). “” The decree also included the follow- ing provision: It is further ordered that pursuant to the Nebraska Child Support Guidelines §4-212, both parents shall share in all reasonable and necessary direct expenditures made solely for the child(ren) such as clothing and…”
Kelly v. Kelly (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). “The parties agreed to this deviation in lieu of using the joint custody expense sharing provision under Section 4-212 of the Nebraska Child Support Guidelines.”
Santillano v. Santillano-Escobar (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). “Oscar relies heavily on § 4-212 and Patton v. Patton, supra. Section 4-212 provides that when a specific provision for joint physical custody is ordered and each party’s parenting time exceeds 142 days per year, it is a rebuttable presumption that support shall be calculated…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 4-212(1) — 1 case
Berman v. United States Nat'l Bank, 249 N.W.2d 187 (Neb. 1976). “The right to charge back terminates if and when a settlement received becomes final, § 4-212, U.C.C., because of final payment by the payor bank.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.