(1) In any action for damages for bodily injuries or for wrongful death when it is alleged that the claimant suffered damages for the cost of medical care, custodial care or rehabilitation services, evidence which tends to establish that the claimant or another person so damaged has been or shall be reimbursed or paid for any such item of damage, cost, or expense, in whole or in part, by any nonrefundable medical reimbursement insurance shall not be admissible in evidence or brought to the attention of the jury, but such nonrefundable medical reimbursement insurance benefits, less all premiums paid by or for the claimant, may be taken as a credit against any judgment rendered. The matter of any credit to be deducted from a judgment shall be determined by the court in a separate hearing or upon the stipulation of the parties.
(2) Damages recoverable in any action shall be those losses which have been or shall be sustained by the claimant as a direct and proximate result of the defendant's wrongful acts as established by a preponderance of the evidence. In wrongful death actions, pecuniary loss to a widow or widower, any dependent, or next of kin shall be subject to all of the terms and provisions of sections 44-2801 to 44-2855.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2023 · leading case:
Prendergast v. Nelson, 256 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 1977).
Prendergast v. Nelson, 256 N.W.2d 657 (Neb. 1977).
· cites it 6× “Section 44-2819, R.S.Supp., 1976, provides that any payment to a claimant from a nonrefundable medical reimbursement insurance plan, by reason of his alleged injury, may be taken as a credit against any judgment rendered under the act.”
Cohan v. Med. Imaging Consultants, 900 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. 2017).
· cites it 2× “23 In the medical malpractice context, the element of proximate causation requires proof that the physician’s deviation from the standard of care caused or contributed to the injury or damage to the plaintiff.”
Jessen v. Malhotra, 112 F. Supp. 2d 917 (D. Neb. 2000).
· cites it 2× “Although this section only refers to patients’ claims, and thus does not necessarily pertain to a wrongful death action, elsewhere the Act provides: “In wrongful death actions, pecuniary loss to a widow or widower, any dependent, or next of kin shall be subject to all of the…”
Hansen v. United States, No. 8:21-cv-00371 (D. Neb. Jan. 26, 2023).
· cites it 2× “”); see also Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-2819 (recognizing in medical malpractice actions that costs for medical expenses are recoverable, but may be subject to a credit after trial.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-2819(1): 2 cases
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-2819(2): 1 case
Jessen v. Malhotra, 112 F. Supp. 2d 917 (D. Neb. 2000).
“Although this section only refers to patients’ claims, and thus does not necessarily pertain to a wrongful death action, elsewhere the Act provides: “In wrongful death actions, pecuniary loss to a widow or widower, any dependent, or next of kin shall be subject to all of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.